A patent deal in which Endo Pharmaceuticals paid generic-drug maker Impax Laboratories to forgo launching a generic version of an opioid pain medication did not violate consumer protection statutes, a Federal Trade Commission (FTC) administrative law judge ruled Friday, May 18, because the settlement’s pro-competitive benefits outweighed the anticompetitive harm, reported Law360.
The original complaint in 2012 accused Endo of working a deal in which they compensated Watson Laboratories “hundreds of millions of dollars” to hold off a generic version of Endo’s Lidoderm patch. It also accused Endo of paying Impax US$112 million in 2010 to hold off releasing an authorized generic version of Endo’s painkiller Opana. The FTC alleged Endo’s financial gain by giving it time to transition patients to a new formulation of Opana ER, “thereby maintaining its monopoly power.”
Full Content: Law 360
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
FTC to Approve Exxon’s $64 Billion Deal with Pioneer Resources, Excludes
May 1, 2024 by
CPI
UK Competition Watchdog Raises Alarm Over Nvidia’s ARM Takeover
May 1, 2024 by
CPI
Sen. Klobuchar Urges Regulators to Probe Collusion in Health Care Pricing
May 1, 2024 by
CPI
Multiple States Join Tennessee’s Antitrust Lawsuit Against NCAA Over NIL Rules
May 1, 2024 by
CPI
NY AG Joins Suit Challenging NCAA’s Restrictions on Student Athlete NIL Rights
May 1, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI