A PYMNTS Company

US: Appeals court affirms ruling for DuPont in price-fixing suit

By  |  October 4, 2017

This week a federal appeals court affirmed a judge’s ruling in favor of chemical company DuPont in a lawsuit alleging price-fixing involving a widely used industrial pigment.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    The Third Circuit court panel on Monday, October 2, upheld a Delaware judge’s decision last year granting summary judgment to DuPont in a lawsuit brought by the Valspar Corporation, a Minnesota-based manufacturer of paints and coatings.

    Valspar claimed that it was overcharged US$176 million for titanium dioxide after DuPont conspired with three other companies starting in 2002 to control the price of the whitening pigment, resulting in 31 parallel price increases by the companies over the next 12 years.

    DuPont argued that the pricing was the natural consequence of the marketplace. The judge ruled that evidence of an actual agreement to fix prices was lacking.

    Full Content: New York Times

    Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.