Roderick Meiklejohn, Sep 11, 2014
When comparing national competition authorities, four questions arise: How great is the risk that the government’s powers of appointment could be used to “capture” the competition agency? What are the minimum resources needed to enable a competition authority to function effectively in a developed country? Does the ability to impose sanctions on individuals, as well as companies, significantly enhance the effectiveness of national competition authorities? What are the advantages and disadvantages of charging competition authorities with responsibilities in other, related policy areas as in Germany and the United Kingdom — Are there significant synergies — Is there a danger that priorities will be unclear? The aim of the present article is to discuss, with reference to a wide range of countries, considerations that are relevant to answering these questions.
Featured News
Supreme Court Lets CREXi Antitrust Case Against CoStar Move Forward
Mar 23, 2026 by
CPI
Oregon Just Passed the Country’s Toughest Chatbot Law. Your Company May Already Be Breaking It.
Mar 23, 2026 by
CPI
Newsmax, DirecTV Join Challenge to FCC’s Nexstar-Tegna Decision
Mar 23, 2026 by
CPI
House Committee Readies Hearing on Tokenized Securities Trading Rules
Mar 23, 2026 by
CPI
Vinson & Elkins Launches Brussels Office With Hire of Hogan Lovells Antitrust Partner
Mar 23, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Data-Driven Competition
Mar 19, 2026 by
CPI
Data-Driven Competition: Implications For Enforcement and Merger Control
Mar 19, 2026 by
Alexandre de Corniere & Greg Taylor
From Tipping to Trustees: Why Data-Driven Markets Require Institutional Design, Not Optimization
Mar 19, 2026 by
Jens Prüfer & Paul de Bijl
Data Barriers to Entry: What We’ve Learned About Spotting Them and What We Still Don’t Know About Solutions
Mar 19, 2026 by
Bruno Carballa-Smichowski
When the Perfect Is the Enemy of the Good: Price Discrimination, Affordability, Precarity and Market Dynamism
Mar 19, 2026 by
Dan Ciuriak