Cable manufacturer Nexans SA has gone to the highest court in the EU as it looks to appeal a recent European Commission decision that ordered the company’s offices to be raided by officials, resulting in the seizure of swathes of documents. If granted, Nexans is looking to have the EU Court of Justice return the case for review to the lower EU Court, the EU General Court. In court documents, Nexans has called the raids “overly broad, insufficiently justified and insufficiently precise.” A similar case was presented to the EU General Court when a decision partially annulled the Commission’s ruling in 2009 to raid Nexans and Prysmian SpA concerning an investigation that accused the companies of price-fixing undersea and underground cables; Nexans now argues that the previous ruling should not have rejected the company’s argument to annul the raids. The Commission sent formal complaints to several companies concerning the matter in 2011.
Featured News
Google Revamps Android App Store Rules, Cuts Fees Amid Global Antitrust Pressure
Mar 4, 2026 by
CPI
White House Reviews Tencent’s Gaming Stakes as Trump Prepares for China Visit
Mar 4, 2026 by
CPI
Charles River Associates Adds Senior Consultant to Antitrust Practice
Mar 4, 2026 by
CPI
DOJ Investigates Major Fertilizer Producers Over Possible Price Coordination
Mar 4, 2026 by
CPI
NY Bill Would Bar AI Chatbots From Providing ‘Substantive’ Medical or Legal Responses
Mar 4, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Behavioral Economics
Feb 22, 2026 by
CPI
Behavioral Antitrust in 2026
Feb 22, 2026 by
Maurice Stucke
Behavioral Economics in Competition Policy: Going Beyond Inertia and Framing Effects
Feb 22, 2026 by
Annemieke Tuinstra & Richard May
Agreeing to Disagree in Antitrust
Feb 22, 2026 by
Jorge Padilla
Recognizing What’s Around the Corner: Merger Control, Capabilities, and the New Nature of Potential Competition
Feb 22, 2026 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece