The US Supreme Court ruled this week that Comcast, the nation’s largest cable company, will not be forced to defend itself against a major, multi-million dollar class action in a 5-4 vote overturning a lower court’s previous decision. According to the Justices, the lawsuit, which accused the cable company of monopolizing the market in Philadelphia, was too “unwieldy” to proceed. The Comcast customers accused the company of colluding with competitors to exchange territories, allegedly ensuring control over the market – claims that Comcast denies. The Court’s opinion by Justice Antonin Scalia explained that the class action failed to meet requirements demonstrating the levels of monetary damages for each of the individual parties of the suit, and that the plaintiffs’ allegations were too broad.
Featured News
EU’s Largest Economies Push to Reduce Reliance on Foreign Payment Systems
Mar 12, 2026 by
CPI
Warren Presses Amazon for Answers on Pricing Practices for Government Buyers
Mar 12, 2026 by
CPI
EU Antitrust Chief Raises Concerns Over Big Tech Control of AI
Mar 12, 2026 by
CPI
Burson Adds Senior Advisor to Strengthen Competition Team
Mar 12, 2026 by
CPI
South Korea Fines Pork Processors for Price-Fixing in Retail Supply Deals
Mar 12, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Behavioral Economics
Feb 22, 2026 by
CPI
Behavioral Antitrust in 2026
Feb 22, 2026 by
Maurice Stucke
Behavioral Economics in Competition Policy: Going Beyond Inertia and Framing Effects
Feb 22, 2026 by
Annemieke Tuinstra & Richard May
Agreeing to Disagree in Antitrust
Feb 22, 2026 by
Jorge Padilla
Recognizing What’s Around the Corner: Merger Control, Capabilities, and the New Nature of Potential Competition
Feb 22, 2026 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece