US: Motion filed to dismiss suit against Blue Cross, but insurer not off the hook
A joint motion was filed with the US District Court in Detroit on Tuesday to dismiss a suit against Blue Cross Blue Shield concerning the insurer’s “most favored nation” clauses in various contracts. The Department of Justice, the state of Michigan and BCBS have filed the motion in response to recent legislation banning the most favored nation clauses for all health insurers. The law goes into affect January 2014, but the state’s insurance commissioner has ordered insurers to not use the clause in any contract as of February 2013. The most favored nation clauses were considered anticompetitive as it forced some hospitals to charge higher prices when dealing with BCBS’s competitors.
Featured News
New York Puts Businesses on Notice for Algorithmic Pricing
Mar 19, 2026 by
CPI
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer Expands US Antitrust Team with New Partner Hire
Mar 19, 2026 by
CPI
Mexico Antitrust Authority Fines Oxygen Suppliers Over Exclusive Contracts
Mar 19, 2026 by
CPI
EU Cloud Group Pushes for Halt to Broadcom VMware Changes
Mar 19, 2026 by
CPI
Sen. Blackburn Releases Discussion Draft of Bill to Set Federal ‘Framework’ for AI Policy
Mar 19, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Data-Driven Competition
Mar 19, 2026 by
CPI
Data-Driven Competition: Implications For Enforcement and Merger Control
Mar 19, 2026 by
Alexandre de Corniere & Greg Taylor
From Tipping to Trustees: Why Data-Driven Markets Require Institutional Design, Not Optimization
Mar 19, 2026 by
Jens Prüfer & Paul de Bijl
Data Barriers to Entry: What We’ve Learned About Spotting Them and What We Still Don’t Know About Solutions
Mar 19, 2026 by
Bruno Carballa-Smichowski
When the Perfect Is the Enemy of the Good: Price Discrimination, Affordability, Precarity and Market Dynamism
Mar 19, 2026 by
Dan Ciuriak