As the US has filed a suit against Standard & Poor’s for allegedly deliberately misrepresenting their ratings to investors as objective, national policies have been adopted that prohibit competition within the ratings market, say some analysts. While reports say that the lawsuit against S&P is, in part, an effort to increase competition in the ratings industry, the 2006 Credit Agency Reform Act similarly intended to open the field to new competitors and startups in the market has turned out to do the opposite, say analysts. The law, says one analysts, “reinforces the position of the big three,” meaning Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s Investors Service and Fitch Ratings – the three combined provided 96 percent of all government and company ratings in 2011.
Featured News
Coinbase Sues Three States Over Prediction Market Regulations
Dec 19, 2025 by
CPI
Walmart and PayPal Execs Say Prompts Could Trigger AI-Driven Coordination
Dec 19, 2025 by
CPI
Trump Signals New Openness to Filling Democratic Seats on SEC, CFTC, Easing Frictions Over Crypto Bill
Dec 19, 2025 by
CPI
Mexico Antitrust Authority Closes Android Competition Case After Google Commitments
Dec 18, 2025 by
CPI
LinkedIn Antitrust Settlement Faces Setback in California Court
Dec 18, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 16, 2025 by
CPI
Learning from Divergence: The Role of Cross-Country Comparisons in the Evaluation of the DMA
Dec 16, 2025 by
Federico Bruni
New Regulatory Tools for the EU Foreign Direct Investment Screening and Foreign Subsidies Regulation
Dec 16, 2025 by
Ioannis Kokkoris
“Suite Dreams”: Market Definition and Complementarity in the Digital Age
Dec 16, 2025 by
Romain Bizet & Matteo Foschi
The Interaction Between Competition Policy and Consumer Protection: Institutional Design, Behavioral Insights, and Emerging Challenges in Digital Markets
Dec 16, 2025 by
Alessandra Tonazzi