As the US has filed a suit against Standard & Poor’s for allegedly deliberately misrepresenting their ratings to investors as objective, national policies have been adopted that prohibit competition within the ratings market, say some analysts. While reports say that the lawsuit against S&P is, in part, an effort to increase competition in the ratings industry, the 2006 Credit Agency Reform Act similarly intended to open the field to new competitors and startups in the market has turned out to do the opposite, say analysts. The law, says one analysts, “reinforces the position of the big three,” meaning Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s Investors Service and Fitch Ratings – the three combined provided 96 percent of all government and company ratings in 2011.
Featured News
The Hidden Security Risk Inside Your Company’s AI Tools
Mar 13, 2026 by
CPI
EU’s Largest Economies Push to Reduce Reliance on Foreign Payment Systems
Mar 12, 2026 by
CPI
Warren Presses Amazon for Answers on Pricing Practices for Government Buyers
Mar 12, 2026 by
CPI
EU Antitrust Chief Raises Concerns Over Big Tech Control of AI
Mar 12, 2026 by
CPI
Burson Adds Senior Advisor to Strengthen Competition Team
Mar 12, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Behavioral Economics
Feb 22, 2026 by
CPI
Behavioral Antitrust in 2026
Feb 22, 2026 by
Maurice Stucke
Behavioral Economics in Competition Policy: Going Beyond Inertia and Framing Effects
Feb 22, 2026 by
Annemieke Tuinstra & Richard May
Agreeing to Disagree in Antitrust
Feb 22, 2026 by
Jorge Padilla
Recognizing What’s Around the Corner: Merger Control, Capabilities, and the New Nature of Potential Competition
Feb 22, 2026 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece