A Minneapolis federal judge has thrown out a lawsuit against Supervalu and C&S Wholesale Grocers, ruling that the two largest grocery wholesalers in the US did not hamper competition in the market with their 2003 agreement over distribution regions. The agreement, which included some non-compete clauses, pertained to a swap of distribution regions in the Midwest and New England. The two were sued in 2009 by two supermarkets, but US Distrit Judge Ann Montgomery has ruled that the supermarkets failed to prove enough evidence of “unreasonable restraint of trade” resulting from the deal.
Featured News
The Hidden Security Risk Inside Your Company’s AI Tools
Mar 13, 2026 by
CPI
EU’s Largest Economies Push to Reduce Reliance on Foreign Payment Systems
Mar 12, 2026 by
CPI
Warren Presses Amazon for Answers on Pricing Practices for Government Buyers
Mar 12, 2026 by
CPI
EU Antitrust Chief Raises Concerns Over Big Tech Control of AI
Mar 12, 2026 by
CPI
Burson Adds Senior Advisor to Strengthen Competition Team
Mar 12, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Behavioral Economics
Feb 22, 2026 by
CPI
Behavioral Antitrust in 2026
Feb 22, 2026 by
Maurice Stucke
Behavioral Economics in Competition Policy: Going Beyond Inertia and Framing Effects
Feb 22, 2026 by
Annemieke Tuinstra & Richard May
Agreeing to Disagree in Antitrust
Feb 22, 2026 by
Jorge Padilla
Recognizing What’s Around the Corner: Merger Control, Capabilities, and the New Nature of Potential Competition
Feb 22, 2026 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece