A PYMNTS Company

Customers lack standing to sue banks for interchange fees, rules Ninth Circuit

By  |  July 12, 2012

A three-judge panel for the Ninth Circuit for the U.S. Court of Appeals has affirmed a lower court’s holding that customers do not have standing to bring an antitrust lawsuit against banks for ATM fees. The plaintiffs claimed that banks such as JP Morgan Chase, Wells Fargo, and Bank of America colluded over ATM interchange fees that were then passed on to consumers withdrawing funds at foreign ATMs. The lower court and the Ninth Circuit both held that the plaintiffs lacked standing because they are indirect purchasers who did not pay the interchange fees.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    Full content: Reuters

    We’d love to be your preferred source for news.

    Please add us to your preferred sources list so our news, data and interviews show up in your feed. Thanks!

    Add as Preferred Source

     

    Related content: The Regulation of Interchange Fees by the U.S. Federal Reserve Board: A Primer on Economic Principles

     

    Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.