Keith Hylton, Sep 01, 2005
Perhaps no area of antitrust law provokes as much controversy as predatory pricing, the theory that a firm violates the antitrust laws by setting its price too low. Under the standard definition, predatory pricing involves a strategy of cutting price below the level at which a competitor can survive in the market and then raising price to the monopoly level in a later stage known as recoupment period.
Featured News
Supreme Court Lets CREXi Antitrust Case Against CoStar Move Forward
Mar 23, 2026 by
CPI
Oregon Just Passed the Country’s Toughest Chatbot Law. Your Company May Already Be Breaking It.
Mar 23, 2026 by
CPI
Newsmax, DirecTV Join Challenge to FCC’s Nexstar-Tegna Decision
Mar 23, 2026 by
CPI
House Committee Readies Hearing on Tokenized Securities Trading Rules
Mar 23, 2026 by
CPI
Vinson & Elkins Launches Brussels Office With Hire of Hogan Lovells Antitrust Partner
Mar 23, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Data-Driven Competition
Mar 19, 2026 by
CPI
Data-Driven Competition: Implications For Enforcement and Merger Control
Mar 19, 2026 by
Alexandre de Corniere & Greg Taylor
From Tipping to Trustees: Why Data-Driven Markets Require Institutional Design, Not Optimization
Mar 19, 2026 by
Jens Prüfer & Paul de Bijl
Data Barriers to Entry: What We’ve Learned About Spotting Them and What We Still Don’t Know About Solutions
Mar 19, 2026 by
Bruno Carballa-Smichowski
When the Perfect Is the Enemy of the Good: Price Discrimination, Affordability, Precarity and Market Dynamism
Mar 19, 2026 by
Dan Ciuriak