Yesterday, the US Justice Department issued a strong objection to removing the public from the court during discussions of how Google prices online advertising in the antitrust trial.
According to Reuters, the government is working hard to show that Google broke antitrust law to maintain its search engine dominance, seeking that certain information about Google’s pricing for search advertising should not be redacted. When discussing how to resolve the case, David Dahlquist, a representative for the government, argued: “This satisfies public interest because it’s at the core of the DOJ case against Google.”
Though not in agreement with the government’s position, John Schmidtlein, a representative for Google, argued that some discussions of pricing should be to take place in a closed session, excluding the public and reporters.
Read more: Verizon Executive To Testify in US vs. Google Antitrust Trial
Katherine Van Dyck, a senior legal counsel for the American Economic Liberties Project, said: “When you have these cases with massive, broad public interest and public import, the courts need to do a better job of taking that into account, change their rules and keep up with modern technology.”
This antitrust fight could change the future of the internet, which is currently being scrutinized by four major giants by Congress and antitrust enforcers. Evidence of otherwise illegal actions by Google to build up a monopoly have been presented through a Verizon executive, Brian Higgins, who testified about the company’s decision to pre-install Google’s Chrome browser with Google search on its mobile phones. However, Google’s defense is that its high market share has been upholding by the quality of its products.
If Google is found to have broken the law, Judge Amit Mehta will consider how best to resolve the case, which may include ordering Google to cease illegal practices or selling out assets. The lawsuit raised is deemed highly important to the public and carries immense consequences that could have an enormous implication on the future of the internet.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Uruguayan Antitrust Scrutiny Puts Major Meatpacking Deal Between Marfrig and Minerva on Hold
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Alaska Airlines Seeks Dismissal of Consumer Lawsuit Over $1.9 Billion Hawaiian Airlines Buy
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Idaho Attorney General Orders Split of Kootenai Health and Syringa Hospital
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Court Rejects T-Mobile’s Appeal Bid in Antitrust Case Over Sprint Merger
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Google Requests Judge, Not Jury, to Decide on Antitrust Case
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Mapping Antitrust onto Digital Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystems and Competition Law: A Law and Political Economy Approach
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystem Theories of Harm: What is Beyond the Buzzword?
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Open Ecosystems: Benefits, Challenges, and Implications for Antitrust
May 9, 2024 by
CPI