In a scathing rebuke of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Chief District Judge Robert Shelby denounced the regulatory body for what he termed a “gross abuse of power entrusted to it by Congress.” The case in question involves the SEC’s dispute with Digital Licensing, operating under the name DEBT Box, a blockchain technology firm.
The SEC had initiated legal action against DEBT Box in July of last year, alleging fraudulent activities resulting in investor losses amounting to nearly $50 million. However, Judge Shelby’s recent ruling challenges the SEC’s tactics and motivations in the case.
On Monday, Judge Shelby accused the SEC of acting in “bad faith” and intentionally propagating falsehoods to secure an asset freeze and temporary restraining order against DEBT Box. The judge’s criticism didn’t stop there, as he further sanctioned the SEC, directing it to cover the attorneys’ fees and legal costs incurred by DEBT Box.
Read more: House GOP Crypto Bill Lays Out SEC And CFTC Roles
However, Judge Shelby made a point to clarify that his ruling doesn’t offer any opinions on the underlying merits of the case against DEBT Box. Instead, his focus was solely on the misconduct exhibited by the regulatory body.
This verdict comes at a time when the SEC, under the leadership of Chair Gary Gensler, faces mounting criticism for its handling of cryptocurrency-related cases. Gensler, known for his skepticism towards the industry, has often been accused of employing an overly aggressive approach when dealing with crypto firms.
The ruling by Judge Shelby serves as a stark reminder of the importance of fair and just regulatory practices, particularly in emerging sectors like blockchain and cryptocurrency. It underscores the need for regulatory bodies to exercise their authority responsibly, avoiding overreach and ensuring due process for all parties involved.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Uruguayan Antitrust Scrutiny Puts Major Meatpacking Deal Between Marfrig and Minerva on Hold
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Alaska Airlines Seeks Dismissal of Consumer Lawsuit Over $1.9 Billion Hawaiian Airlines Buy
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Idaho Attorney General Orders Split of Kootenai Health and Syringa Hospital
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Court Rejects T-Mobile’s Appeal Bid in Antitrust Case Over Sprint Merger
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Google Requests Judge, Not Jury, to Decide on Antitrust Case
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Mapping Antitrust onto Digital Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystems and Competition Law: A Law and Political Economy Approach
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystem Theories of Harm: What is Beyond the Buzzword?
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Open Ecosystems: Benefits, Challenges, and Implications for Antitrust
May 9, 2024 by
CPI