By: Anna Artyushina (Center for International Governance Innovation)
What occurs when artificial intelligence (AI) becomes even more ingrained in our daily lives than it already is? The ArriveCAN incident serves as an instructive example. Auditor General Karen Hogan uncovered numerous breaches in the procurement, development, and rollout of the application, which mistakenly forced tens of thousands of Canadians into quarantine and, according to legal experts, infringed upon the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
More alarmingly, Canada’s border authorities lack documentation to justify the $59.5 million expenditure on the app. In the Netherlands, an AI-powered application covertly deployed by tax authorities erroneously identified thousands for tax evasion, leading to temporary custody loss for some families.
These instances underscore that governing algorithms boils down to fundamental democratic governance. Technology products are often obscured for commercial motives, a practice that cannot be tolerated. With AI, the potential harms, spanning from misinformation to electoral interference to the erosion of democratic institutions and our way of life, are too significant to ignore.
In light of this, Canada is poised to renegotiate trade agreements with key partners, inevitably raising the question of AI regulation. While the nation stands to gain from unhindered AI trade, robust mechanisms for accountability and recourse for these systems must be in place.
Consider the case of Jake Moffatt, a British Columbia resident, who, in 2022, sought to book a flight to attend his grandmother’s funeral via Air Canada’s website. The airline’s chatbot ostensibly offered assistance regarding bereavement policies, advising Moffatt to purchase full-price tickets and seek a refund afterward. However, the chatbot’s guidance proved erroneous as Air Canada lacked retroactive bereavement policies.
Despite the algorithm’s error, the airline refused accountability, shifting the responsibility to the customer for not verifying the chatbot’s information. Moffatt escalated the matter to the British Columbia Civil Resolution Tribunal and emerged victorious. In February 2024, the tribunal ordered Air Canada to reimburse Moffatt $650.88, representing the discrepancy between regular and bereavement fares.
Featured News
Kenya’s Competition Authority Proposes Tougher Regulations on Big Tech
May 30, 2024 by
CPI
KKR Secures EU Antitrust Approval for $24 Billion Acquisition of Telecom Italia’s Fixed-Line Network
May 30, 2024 by
CPI
European Court Sides with Tech Giants in Italian Regulatory Dispute
May 30, 2024 by
CPI
US Steel and Nippon Steel Secure International Approvals for $14.9B Merger
May 30, 2024 by
CPI
EU Watchdog Mandates Boardroom Accountability for AI in Banks
May 30, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Merger Guidelines Retrospective
May 21, 2024 by
CPI
Mergers of Complements
May 21, 2024 by
CPI
Personality Traits, Private Equity, and Merger Analysis
May 21, 2024 by
CPI
The 2023 Merger Guidelines: Lessons in the Importance of Incipiency, Modern Economics, and Monopsony
May 21, 2024 by
CPI
The 2023 Merger Guidelines: Sharpening Merger Analysis
May 21, 2024 by
CPI