In a united front, 42 attorneys general from various states have filed a lawsuit against Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, over allegations of addictive features designed to target children and teenagers. This bipartisan legal action signifies a substantial challenge to Meta’s business operations.
Meta is currently facing multiple legal battles across various jurisdictions, with attorneys general from 33 states initiating a federal suit in the Northern District of California. An additional nine attorneys general are pursuing their own lawsuits in their respective states. Among the states involved in the federal suit are New York, California, Colorado, Louisiana, Nebraska, South Carolina, Washington, and Wisconsin, reported CNBC.
This is not the first time that a coalition of state attorneys general has taken on Meta. In 2020, 48 states and territories, alongside a separate complaint from the Federal Trade Commission, sued the company on antitrust grounds.
Related: Meta Defends Itself Against EU’s Accusations Of Misuse Of Dominance
The core allegation made by the attorneys general is that Meta deliberately engineered its Facebook and Instagram platforms to retain young users for extended periods and encourage repeated engagement. The means employed for achieving this, as outlined in the federal complaint, involve the design of algorithms, the proliferation of alerts and notifications, and the introduction of infinite scrolling features in platform feeds. Additionally, the company is accused of incorporating elements that adversely affect the mental health of teenagers, such as social comparison and the promotion of body dysmorphia through features like “likes” and photo filters.
Furthermore, the federal lawsuit accuses Meta of violating the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) by collecting personal data from users under the age of 13 without obtaining parental consent.
The attorneys general assert that Meta was fully aware of the detrimental consequences of its design on young users. According to a press release from New York Attorney General Letitia James’ office, “While Meta has publicly denied and downplayed these harmful effects, it cannot credibly plead ignorance. Meta’s own internal research documents show its awareness that its products harm young users. Indeed, internal studies that Meta commissioned — and kept private until they were leaked by a whistleblower and publicly reported — reveal that Meta has known for years about these serious harms associated with young users’ time spent on its platforms.”
Source: CNBC
Featured News
Turkey Ends Meta Investigation Over Threads and Instagram
Dec 8, 2024 by
CPI
Supreme Court to Hear CCI Petition on Amazon, Flipkart Antitrust Cases
Dec 8, 2024 by
CPI
Senators Urge Antitrust Probe Into FanDuel and DraftKings
Dec 8, 2024 by
CPI
Novo Holdings Secures EU Approval for $16.5 Billion Catalent Acquisition
Dec 8, 2024 by
CPI
US Appeals Court Upholds TikTok Divestment Law, Paving Way for Potential Ban
Dec 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Moats & Entrenchment
Nov 29, 2024 by
CPI
Assessing the Potential for Antitrust Moats and Trenches in the Generative AI Industry
Nov 29, 2024 by
Allison Holt, Sushrut Jain & Ashley Zhou
How SEP Hold-up Can Lead to Entrenchment
Nov 29, 2024 by
Jay Jurata, Elena Kamenir & Christie Boyden
The Role of Moats in Unlocking Economic Growth
Nov 29, 2024 by
CPI
Overcoming Moats and Entrenchment: Disruptive Innovation in Generative AI May Be More Successful than Regulation
Nov 29, 2024 by
Simon Chisholm & Charlie Whitehead