Amarin was hit with federal antitrust claims in New Jersey over its alleged scheme to delay generic versions of the cardiovascular drug Vascepa—its only product—by using exclusive supply agreements to block rivals from accessing the drug’s active pharmaceutical ingredient.
“Amarin’s hoarding” is “contrary to industry practice” and “cannot be justified by any legitimate business reason,” the complaint stated. “The only explanation for Amarin’s various supply agreements is that it has been paying API suppliers to not supply to generic competitors.”
According to Bloomberg, Amarin had been entering into agreements with the only viable suppliers of this critical ingredient since as early as 2012, and the most recent purported agreement was the final nail in the coffin for DRL’s planned icosapent ethyl product. The plaintiff stated it tried to contact these suppliers, along with others that were not in agreements with Amarin, but all were unable to provide the materials quickly enough for DRL’s proposed launch date.
The plaintiff noted that the alleged cornering of the icosapent ethyl API market by Amarin came after DRL prevailed in patent litigation initiated by Amarin in March 2020 over Vascepa. Accordingly, the plaintiff alleged, since Amarin could not convince the courts to stop DRL from entering the market with its product, the defendants resorted to anticompetitive conduct.
“Amarin’s hoarding of icosapent ethyl API supplies is contrary to industry practice, cannot be justified by any legitimate business reason, and can only be explained as part of an anticompetitive strategy to prevent and delay generic competition to its branded Vascepa,” the complaint claimed.
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
FTC Takes On Prescription Drug Middlemen Over High Insulin Costs
Sep 20, 2024 by
CPI
EU’s Incoming Competition Head Pushes for Policy Shift to Support ‘European Champions
Sep 19, 2024 by
CPI
Google Challenges $217 Million Legal Fee Demand in Privacy Case
Sep 19, 2024 by
CPI
EU Moves to Enforce Apple’s Compliance with New Market Rules
Sep 19, 2024 by
CPI
California Attorney General Bonta Stands Firm Against Albertsons-Kroger Merger
Sep 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Canada & Mexico
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI
Competitive Convergence: Mexico’s 30-Year Quest for Antitrust Parity with its Northern Neighbor
Sep 3, 2024 by
Francisco Javier Núñez Melgoza
Competition and Digital Markets in North America: A Comparative Study of Antitrust Investigations in Mexico and the United States
Sep 3, 2024 by
Julio Garcia
Recent Antitrust Development in Mexico: COFECE’s Preliminary Report on Amazon and Mercado Libre
Sep 3, 2024 by
Alejandra Palacios Prieto
The Cost of Making COFECE Disappear
Sep 3, 2024 by
Mateo Fernández