Diogo Thomson de Andrade, Carlos Ragazzo, Jul 24, 2012
Throughout the world, competition authorities are used to allocating much of their human resources to cartel detection and punishment. The main justification for this allotment is linked to the potential harm that these agreements pose for the economy and, foremost, to consumers. It is not a coincidence that many countries criminalize cartels, requiring action not just on behalf of competition authorities but also that of other investigative State authorities, such as, for example, public prosecutors.
Featured News
Apple Eases EU Tracking Rules After Antitrust Scrutiny
Sep 17, 2026 by
CPI
FTC Moves to Restrict Beretta’s Board Influence in Ruger Investment
Sep 17, 2026 by
CPI
Justice Department Open to Talks With AI Labs on Safety Coordination
Sep 17, 2026 by
CPI
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader Adds Skadden Antitrust Partner in Brussels Push
Sep 17, 2026 by
CPI
Paramount Threatens California Exit as Warner Bros. Antitrust Fight Escalates
Sep 17, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Computational Antitrust
Sep 16, 2026 by
CPI
The Next Five Years of Computational Antitrust
Sep 16, 2026 by
Thibault Schrepel
When Two AI Agents Talk: A Gap in Detection Capabilities
Sep 16, 2026 by
Alba Ribera Martinez
When Innovation Competition Has No Product Yet: Making General Innovation Competition Operational
Sep 16, 2026 by
Mariateresa Maggiolino
Computational Antitrust for Complex Adaptive Markets
Sep 16, 2026 by
Filip Lubinski