The Booksellers Association (BA) has welcomed the European Commission’s announcement that it has accepted commitments by Amazon barring it from using marketplace seller data.
Earlier this week Amazon agreed to make changes to its business in Europe as part of a settlement with the European Union (EU) over antitrust investigations that could have resulted in a large fine.
Within the EU, Amazon will make the Buy Box more competitive, allow third-party merchants to participate in Prime while using outside logistics providers, and block Amazon from using internal data to compete with third-party merchants.
Read more: Amazon & Co Move To Dismiss Booksellers’ Antitrust Suit
The BA was particularly concerned with the latter and said it “welcomed” news that “Amazon, and its software, will now be forbidden from analysing non-public third-party seller data, and will treat all sellers equally when deciding which offer to put in the best screen location. Sellers will also be allowed to choose their own delivery firm, rather than being obliged to use the service chosen by Amazon’s Prime premium service.”
Meryl Halls, m.d. at the BA, said: “The BA has advocated in the UK and elsewhere in Europe for many years the urgent need to tackle the ways in which Amazon uses its market heft. Amazon’s practices damage the common good, most especially for small businesses like independent bookshops and we welcome the European Commission’s announcement as a necessary step in ensuring that online retail markets will operate in fair, open and transparent ways, while clarifying in more explicit terms how this should work.
She added: “It should mean that there are now more opportunities for independent retailers to compete and sell online, and that customers will have better choices, including BA members in Ireland. In the UK we await the ruling of the CMA on its ongoing investigation into Amazon’s Marketplace, and we hope that will also secure much needed improved transparency and access for online sellers.”
Featured News
Federal Judge Orders Google to Open Android App Store Amid Antitrust Pressure
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Greenlights FTC’s Antitrust Lawsuit Against Amazon, Tosses Some State Claims
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Supreme Court Rejects Uber and Lyft’s Appeal in California Gig Worker Suits
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Supreme Court Sidesteps 5-Hour Energy Pricing Case, Allowing Antitrust Claims to Proceed
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Tempur Sealy and Mattress Firm Argue FTC Proceedings Are Unconstitutional in New Suit
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh