A PYMNTS Company

China: Supreme Court reaches decision in Qihoo 360 v. Tencent

By  |  October 16, 2014
China: Supreme Court reaches decision in Qihoo 360 v. Tencent

Nearly a year after China’s Guangdong High People’s Court issued a landmark decision in a longstanding dispute between major IT companies Tencent and Qihoo 360, reports say the Supreme Court has issued a decision on the case on Thursday in Beijing.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    The Supreme Court has upheld the Guangdong High People’s Court’s earlier ruling that dismissed allegations of anticompetitive conduct against Tencent initiated by Qihoo.

    Qihoo 360 launched legal action against Tencent accusing its rival of unfair bundling and exclusive dealing stemming from a 2010 incident during which Tencent ordered its users to stop using Qihoo 360’s antivirus software in order to continue using Tencent’s IM software. Tencent allowed users to use antivirus software made by companies other than Qihoo, however, including its own.

    While Tencent rescinded the decision following backlash, Qihoo filed a private antitrust complaint against Tencent to seek damages. Qihoo eventually appealed the Guangdong High People’s Court order that dismissed Qihoo’s allegations of anticompetitive conduct.

    The case is considered a groundbreaking one for China, whose Anti-Monopoly Law was only launched in 2008. Experts say the Guangdong High People’s Court decision marked a major milestone in China’s antitrust analysis within the Internet and technology sectors; the Supreme Court’s decision to uphold the Guangdong High People’s Court order solidifies that milestone.

    Stay tuned for an upcoming article on the case by Vanessa Yanhua Zhang (Global Economics Group).

    Related content: Analyzing Competition Among Internet Players: Qihoo 360 v. Tencent

    Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.