The European Court of Justice issued an interesting judgment on the extent to which existing antitrust price-fixing principles can be applied to interactions between the administrator of a shared technology platform and its users. Specifically, in the Eturas case, the ECJ had to consider the extent to which users’ involvement in an anticompetitive concerted practice initiated by the system administrator of a shared IT platform may be inferred simply from the fact that the administrator sent messages to users concerning pricing and centrally implemented technical rules that affected how users could display their prices.
Featured News
Digital-Asset Treasury Companies Push Boundaries of Corporate Finance
Nov 7, 2025 by
CPI
European Commission Considering Delaying Full Implementation of AI Act by a Year
Nov 7, 2025 by
CPI
Judge Withholds Approval of Google–Epic Games Antitrust Settlement Pending Review
Nov 6, 2025 by
CPI
Bank of England Vows to Issue Stablecoin Regs ‘Just as Quickly as the U.S.’
Nov 6, 2025 by
CPI
No Federal Bailout for AI, Says White House Tech Chief
Nov 6, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Costs of Consolidation
Oct 26, 2025 by
CPI
Does Merger Enforcement Protect Consumers from the Long-Term Costs of Consolidation?
Oct 26, 2025 by
Diana L. Moss
“Praying for Inflation”: How Market Concentration Facilitates Inflationary Pressures
Oct 26, 2025 by
John Kwoka & Muhammad Shabanpour
Unpacking the Remedy: The Hidden Costs of Merger Remedies and the Economist’s Role in Getting Them Right
Oct 26, 2025 by
Sam R. Carless, Mary Coleman & David Weiskopf
Why Industry Consolidation Causes More Concern Than It Should
Oct 26, 2025 by
Michael Noel