
Amazon faced a setback on Wednesday as Europe’s highest court upheld a requirement concerning its online advertising under EU tech rules. The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) sided with EU regulators, underscoring that the interests of the European Union outweighed those of the US e-commerce giant.
The decision stems from the Digital Services Act (DSA), which came into effect last year and designated Amazon as a very large online platform subject to stringent regulations aimed at combating illegal and harmful content on its platform, as reported by Reuters.
Amazon had contested a DSA provision mandating the disclosure of detailed information on its online advertising practices. Moreover, the company sought an interim measure until the court resolved the case.
Initially, a lower tribunal granted Amazon’s request for an interim measure to suspend the contested obligation in September. However, this move prompted the European Commission to escalate the matter to the CJEU.
Read more: Amazon Denies Monopolistic Threat in Mexico Amid Regulatory Scrutiny
The Luxembourg-based court set aside the suspension order and dismissed Amazon’s application for an interim measure. The judge highlighted Amazon’s argument that the obligation infringed upon its fundamental rights to privacy and freedom to conduct business, acknowledging its relevance.
However, the judge also pointed out the potential consequences of suspension, noting that it could lead to significant delays in achieving the objectives of the DSA. He emphasized that such a delay could allow an online environment posing threats to fundamental rights to persist or even intensify.
“The interests defended by the EU legislature prevail, in the present case, over Amazon’s material interests, with the result that the balancing of interests weighs in favour of rejecting the request for suspension,” the judge stated.
This ruling marks a crucial milestone in the ongoing battle between tech giants and regulatory authorities, particularly in the EU, where concerns over online content moderation and advertising practices have been mounting.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Australia’s Major Supermarkets Face Scrutiny Over Profit Margins Amid Rising Prices
Mar 21, 2025 by
CPI
Fired FTC Commissioners Warn of Potential White House Influence Over Mergers
Mar 20, 2025 by
CPI
Dr. Matthew Backus Joins Compass Lexecon as an Affiliate
Mar 20, 2025 by
CPI
UK to Boost Broadband Competition While Capping Openreach Charges, Says Ofcom
Mar 20, 2025 by
CPI
Singapore Competition Watchdog Yet to Receive Formal Notification on Grab-GoTo Merger
Mar 20, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li