While Google continues to face intense scrutiny within Germany, the latest reports say Germany’s competition authorities actually support the European Commission’s highly criticized settlement with the conglomerate.
According to reports, Germany’s Federal Cartel Office created a 42-page review of the EU settlement and found that the Commission has reached the limits of competition law in the case. According to the Office, the settlement is a “suitable approach to counter the barriers to competitors,” the report says, adding that the Commission used the full extent of antitrust law to crack down on Google as harshly as legally possible.
But as Google faces intense scrutiny by German politicians, including some calls to break up the company, the Office’s report recommends possible changes to EU competition law that would allow authorities to further address the expanding competition concerns felt by consumer advocates and Google rivals in Germany and across the EU. The Office, however, stopped short of suggesting a breakup of Google, warning that steps towards such an action would be misguided.
Germany is not alone in criticizing the EU’s handling of the Google case, which accused Google of abusing its market dominance to highlight its own products in services in search results ahead of rivals’. Most recently, online review site Yelp filed a notice with the Commission against Google; other rivals and consumer advocates have also called on European Commissioner Joaquin Almunia to alter the settlement with Google and intensify its regulation over the company.
Almunia, however, appears steadfast on proceeding with the settlement before he leaves his position at the Commission later this year. In efforts to quell concerns over the agreement, Almunia assured that Google would continue to face a slew of new complaints and competition probes.
Full content: Financial Times
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
House Passes ‘Take It Down Act,’ the First Major AI-Related Federal Regulation
Apr 29, 2025 by
CPI
Michigan Sues Express Scripts, Prime Therapeutics for Alleged Price-Fixing Scheme
Apr 29, 2025 by
CPI
Tech Rivals Testify as FTC Antitrust Trial Against Meta Enters Defining Phase
Apr 29, 2025 by
CPI
Spanish Judge Investigates Nationwide Blackout as Possible Cyber Threat
Apr 29, 2025 by
CPI
Trump Administration Pushes EU to Delay AI Regulations
Apr 29, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Mergers in Digital Markets
Apr 21, 2025 by
CPI
Catching a Killer? Six “Genetic Markers” to Assess Nascent Competitor Acquisitions
Apr 21, 2025 by
John Taladay & Christine Ryu-Naya
Digital Decoded: Is There More Scope for Digital Mergers In 2025?
Apr 21, 2025 by
Colin Raftery, Michele Davis, Sarah Jensen & Martin Dickson
AI In the Mix – An Ever-Evolving Approach to Jurisdiction Over Digital Mergers in Europe
Apr 21, 2025 by
Ingrid Vandenborre & Ketevan Zukakishvili
Antitrust Enforcement Errors Due to a Failure to Understand Organizational Capabilities and Dynamic Competition
Apr 21, 2025 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece