The European Commission has launched a probe into Microsoft’s practices amidst allegations that the tech giant may be obstructing customers from using certain security software from its competitors.
This investigation, revealed through a document obtained by Reuters in January, sheds light on yet another contentious issue in the ongoing scrutiny of Microsoft’s business operations within the European Union.
Over the years, numerous companies have voiced concerns regarding Microsoft’s bundling services and its practices in cloud computing, prompting European regulators to initiate several investigations. While Microsoft has asserted efforts to address the grievances of its rivals, the latest focus of the European Commission’s examination is on Microsoft’s Entra ID software, previously known as Azure Active Directory, reported Reuters.
Read more: EU Looks into Microsoft’s Tie-Up with France’s Mistral AI
Entra ID plays a pivotal role for businesses, offering control over user access to cloud-based applications. However, regulators are probing whether Microsoft’s customers are restricted to using only Entra ID for authentication into Microsoft services or if they have the option to utilize rival software as well. A spokesperson for the European Commission confirmed that multiple complaints have been received regarding Microsoft, particularly concerning its product Azure, and are undergoing evaluation through standard procedures.
News of the commission’s investigation was first reported by The Information, which cited a document sent to a Microsoft rival. This development comes amidst growing tensions in the tech industry, with Alphabet’s Google recently intensifying criticism of Microsoft’s cloud-computing practices. Google has accused its rival of attempting to establish a monopoly that could impede the advancement of emerging technologies such as generative artificial intelligence. However, Microsoft has vehemently denied these allegations.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Trump Nominates Olivia Trusty for FCC Commissioner Role Ahead of Inauguration
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Lawyers Claim eXp’s Settlement Tactics Hurt Antitrust Case Potential
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Amex GBT Pushes Back Against DOJ Lawsuit Over CWT Acquisition
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Belgium Opens Antitrust Probe into AB InBev’s Market Practices
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Tech Groups Sue CFPB Over New Rule on Digital Wallet Oversight
Jan 16, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand