A PYMNTS Company

FTC Hits Oil Giants Over Gun-Jumping Violation in Pre-Merger Deal

 |  January 7, 2025

Crude oil producers XCL Resources Holdings, Verdun Oil Company, and EP Energy will collectively pay a hefty $5.6 million penalty to resolve allegations of illegal coordination prior to a merger, which disrupted oil supply and contributed to rising fuel costs across the U.S.

According to a statement from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the trio engaged in unlawful “gun-jumping” activities that violated the Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) Act, which mandates that companies notify federal authorities and wait for approval before completing significant transactions. The merger, valued at $1.4 billion, was slated to be overseen by the FTC and the Department of Justice (DOJ) to ensure compliance with antitrust regulations. However, the companies bypassed this procedure by coordinating business decisions prematurely, the FTC noted in its complaint.

Per the complaint, Verdun, which was managed alongside XCL at the time, moved ahead with operational control over EP’s day-to-day operations well before the official merger closure. This coordination reportedly included halting planned drilling activities at EP and engaging in joint management of customer contracts in the Uinta Basin region of Utah. Additionally, Verdun and EP coordinated pricing strategies for EP’s Texas-based customers, ultimately leading to a shortage in crude oil supplies.

Read more: FTC Targets Oil Executive John Hess Over Alleged Collusion with OPEC

These actions resulted in a significant disruption, exacerbating the oil supply crisis when the U.S. was already facing substantial shortages and surging oil prices. According to the complaint, the unlawful practices directly contributed to higher prices at gas stations, burdening consumers with steep costs.

The FTC’s investigation, launched after the merger agreement was signed in July 2021, revealed major concerns regarding competition in the Uinta Basin, where the transaction could have eliminated crucial competition between two of the few remaining oil producers. In response to these findings, the FTC implemented a remedy that required the divestiture of EP’s operations in Utah.

The coordination between XCL, Verdun, and EP continued until October 2021, when an amendment was made to the deal, allowing EP to operate independently once more. The formal waiting period for the merger ended in March 2022, bringing an end to the violation after 94 days of illegal coordination.

The settlement, which represents the largest fine ever imposed for a gun-jumping violation, was voted on by the FTC with a 4-0-1 outcome. The case has now been forwarded to the DOJ for filing in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

Source: FTC

Federal Appeals Court Temporarily Halts Ruling in Consumer Bureau Battle Federal Appeals Court Temporarily Halts Ruling in CFPB Battle

Federal Appeals Court Temporarily Halts Ruling in Consumer Bureau Battle

 |  April 3, 2025

A federal appeals court on Thursday temporarily put on hold a lower court ruling that had delivered a significant victory to government employees and consumer advocates opposing President Donald Trump’s efforts to curtail the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). According to Reuters, the decision maintains a temporary pause while the court considers an emergency request from the Justice Department to overturn the previous ruling entirely.

The U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia stopped short of reversing any provisions set forth by U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson in her March 28 ruling. Per Reuters, her decision had ordered the CFPB to reinstate dismissed employees, restore canceled contracts, and continue performing its legally mandated duties. However, the appellate judges left in place interim measures preventing the administration from taking further action against agency staff or halting essential operations.

Despite the temporary stay, the three-judge panel emphasized that the decision should not be interpreted as an indication of their final ruling. “The purpose of this administrative stay is to give the court sufficient opportunity to consider the emergency motion for stay pending appeal and should not be construed in any way as a ruling on the merits of that motion,” the order stated, according to Reuters.

Related: CFPB Allows Some Operations to Resume Amid Legal Challenge

The Justice Department formally notified the court on Saturday of its intent to challenge Judge Berman Jackson’s order, seeking to overturn her directive that prevented the administration from erasing agency data, terminating employees, or discontinuing active contracts. The Trump administration’s moves against the CFPB began in February when the president dismissed the agency’s director and granted officials from Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency extensive access to sensitive CFPB data systems. The actions resulted in widespread layoffs, contract cancellations, and office closures, prompting consumer protection groups and affected workers to file a lawsuit denouncing the changes as unlawful.

According to Reuters, agency leadership has since attempted to walk back some of these measures, a move Judge Berman Jackson described as likely “a charade for the court’s benefit.” While the appeals court’s temporary stay keeps aspects of the lower court’s ruling in place for now, the broader legal battle over the CFPB’s future remains unresolved.

Source: Reuters