In a landmark antitrust trial in Washington, a lawyer representing the U.S. Justice Department scrutinized a Google executive’s testimony regarding the techniques employed by the tech giant to influence online advertising prices.
Google’s Vice President of Product Management, Adam Juda, revealed during his ongoing testimony that the company utilizes a comprehensive formula, incorporating ad quality, to determine auction winners for ad placements on websites. This testimony is part of a broader case in which the U.S. government accuses Google of leveraging its search and advertising dominance unfairly.
The Justice Department’s allegations center on Google’s alleged manipulation of online auctions, a lucrative industry that Google largely dominates, with the aim of benefiting its own financial interests. During the trial, Justice Department attorney David Dahlquist questioned Juda about Google’s statements in a document prepared for the European Union.
Read more: Google’s US Ad Antitrust Suit Trial Date Set For March 2024
The document asserted that Google could “directly affect pricing through tunings of our auction mechanisms.” Juda, however, denied agreement with this statement, reported Reuters.
Under further questioning, Juda acknowledged that adjustments or “tuning” could indeed impact pricing. He explained that one element subject to tuning is a formula that assigns a long-term value (LTV) to an ad based on factors such as the bid amount, potential click-through rate, and the quality of both the advertisement and the associated website.
Google’s advertising practices have faced criticism from advertisers and website publishers, who argue that the company lacks transparency and disproportionately siphons off revenue from the industry.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Ropes & Gray Welcomes New Partner to Boston Antitrust Practice
Nov 4, 2024 by
CPI
Private Equity Giants Eye Minority Stake in Intel’s Altera Chip Unit
Nov 4, 2024 by
CPI
Michael Jordan’s NASCAR Antitrust Case Kicks Off in Federal Court
Nov 4, 2024 by
CPI
Fifth Circuit Questions FTC’s Authority in Intuit’s Challenge to Internal Adjudication
Nov 4, 2024 by
CPI
EU Antitrust Decision on Novo Holdings’ Catalent Acquisition Set for December
Nov 4, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Remedies Revisited
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Fixing the Fix: Updating Policy on Merger Remedies
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Methodology Matters: The 2017 FTC Remedies Study
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
U.S. v. AT&T: Five Lessons for Vertical Merger Enforcement
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
The Search for Antitrust Remedies in Tech Leads Beyond Antitrust
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI