Google parent Alphabet denied claims in an antitrust case in California federal court that the company had deleted employees’ electronic “chats” to deprive plaintiffs of evidence in their case alleging anticompetitive conduct within the Google Play Store.
Lawyers for Google at law firms Morgan, Lewis & Bockius and at Munger, Tolles & Olson in a court filing said the company had taken appropriate steps “to preserve and produce” evidence of employees’ internal chats. The company called the plaintiffs’ bid for sanctions “meritless” and asked US District Judge James Donato in San Francisco to reject the bid.
Read more: Epic Games & Match To Bring New Antitrust Allegations Against Google
Donato is presiding over a series of related cases brought since 2020 by “Fortnite” maker Epic Games Inc, consumers and dozens of US states challenging alleged exclusionary practices in how Google runs its app store. Google has denied the claims.
Judges are regularly called on to referee pretrial fights over evidence, and parties can ask courts to impose sanctions on one side for not following rules.
Google has produced information including contracts, emails, transactional data and other records as part of the litigation.
Last month, the plaintiffs’ lawyers leading cases against Google jointly askedDonato to punish Google for the alleged destruction of “substantive” chat-related information relevant to the pending antitrust claims.
A Google spokesperson on Friday declined to comment about the dispute over chat evidence, and lawyers for plaintiffs did not immediately respond to messages seeking comment.
Featured News
Spain’s Financial Regulator Awaits Antitrust Decision on BBVA’s Hostile Bid for Sabadell
Dec 5, 2024 by
CPI
RealPage Seeks Dismissal of DOJ Antitrust Suit, Citing Legal Flaws
Dec 5, 2024 by
CPI
EU Competition Chief Signals Potential Google Breakup Amid Big Tech Scrutiny
Dec 5, 2024 by
CPI
Turkey Closes Antitrust Probe into Meta’s Threads-Instagram Practices
Dec 5, 2024 by
CPI
Major Overhaul of New Zealand Competition Laws Announced
Dec 5, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Moats & Entrenchment
Nov 29, 2024 by
CPI
Assessing the Potential for Antitrust Moats and Trenches in the Generative AI Industry
Nov 29, 2024 by
Allison Holt, Sushrut Jain & Ashley Zhou
How SEP Hold-up Can Lead to Entrenchment
Nov 29, 2024 by
Jay Jurata, Elena Kamenir & Christie Boyden
The Role of Moats in Unlocking Economic Growth
Nov 29, 2024 by
CPI
Overcoming Moats and Entrenchment: Disruptive Innovation in Generative AI May Be More Successful than Regulation
Nov 29, 2024 by
Simon Chisholm & Charlie Whitehead