
By: Daniel McCuaig (ProMarket)
The Federal Trade Commission recently failed to stop Meta’s acquisition of virtual reality company Within, while the Department of Justice is now attempting to mitigate Google’s monopolization of the online “ad tech stack” by unwinding its 2008 purchase of DoubleClick. Daniel McCuaig outlines the parallels between the two cases and argues that consumers are threatened with anticompetitive harm if the courts continue to side with tech monopolist defendants when faced with uncertainty…
Featured News
Missoula Takes Stand Against Price-Fixing Algorithms in Rental Market
Jul 16, 2025 by
CPI
Canada Approves Major Oilfield Merger with Conditions to Protect Competition
Jul 16, 2025 by
CPI
States Move to Regulate Brain Data Collected by Wearable Consumer Devices
Jul 16, 2025 by
CPI
Trial Begins in Shareholder Suit Over Facebook’s $5 Billion FTC Fine
Jul 16, 2025 by
CPI
Federal Judge Grants Preliminary Victory to NFL in Antitrust Merchandise Lawsuit
Jul 16, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Surveillance Pricing
Jul 14, 2025 by
CPI
Should We Fear Personalized Pricing?
Jul 14, 2025 by
John Yun
Data and Price Competition: The Special Role of Information About Rivals’ Prices
Jul 14, 2025 by
Zach Y. Brown & Alexander MacKay
Surveillance Pricing: A Cautionary Summary of Potential Harms and Solutions
Jul 14, 2025 by
Ginger Zhe Jin, Liad Wagman & Mengyi Zhong
The Rise of Surveillance Pricing
Jul 14, 2025 by
Rebecca Kirk Fair, Alvaro Ziadi & Juan Carvajal