Tim Wu, Dec 20, 2013
Competition law and Intellectual Property have divergent intellectual cultures–the former more pragmatic and experimentalist; the latter influenced by natural law and vested rights. “The US Supreme Court decision in Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis is an intellectual victory for the former approach, one that suggests that antitrust law can and should be used to introduce greater scrutiny of the specific consequences of intellectual property grants…
Featured News
Massachusetts Forces Apartment Sales as Condition of $69 Billion Landlord Merger
Aug 19, 2026 by
CPI
Papa John’s Wins Final Approval for $5 Million No-Poach Settlement
Aug 18, 2026 by
CPI
Apple Revamps EU App Store Rules in Deal With Regulators
Aug 18, 2026 by
CPI
South Korean Prosecutors Raid Conglomerate Over Alleged Stock Manipulation
Aug 18, 2026 by
CPI
Andreessen Horowitz Faces Justice Department Antitrust Scrutiny Over AI Board Seats
Aug 18, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Antitrust Compliance
Jul 20, 2026 by
CPI
Your Antitrust Compliance Program: A Strong Voice in Your Defense
Jul 20, 2026 by
Joe Murphy
Antitrust Compliance for the AI Pricing Era
Jul 20, 2026 by
Alejandra Uria & Andre Geverola
Race to Report: Antitrust Leniency in the Whistleblower Era
Jul 20, 2026 by
Brian R. Faerstein & Nicole H. Sprinzen
Antitrust-By-Design: Competition Compliance in Digital Markets
Jul 20, 2026 by
Marcos Drummond Malvar, Gabriela Costa Carvalho Forsman & Luciana Mendes