A judge has reportedly halted a New York City minimum wage law that is opposed by app-based food delivery firms.
New York State Supreme Court Justice Nicholas Moyne issued a temporary halt to the law that would have gone into effect July 12, saying he must first receive formal arguments from the lawyers for the city and the companies, Bloomberg reported Friday (July 7).
The judge also scheduled another hearing for July 31, according to the report.
The decision comes a day after it was reported that app-based food delivery companies Uber, DoorDash, Grubhub and Relay Delivery filed lawsuits against the minimum wage law, saying the labor costs could make it unfeasible to provide some services.
In its lawsuit, DoorDash said: “This fatally flawed and subjective rulemaking process unsurprisingly worsened these already problematic policies.”
However, Vilda Vera Mayuga, head of the city’s Department of Consumer and Worker Protection, disagreed.
Related: NYC More Than Doubles Food Delivery Gig-Workers Minimum Wage
“Delivery workers, like all workers, deserve fair pay for their labor, and we are disappointed that Uber, DoorDash, Grubhub and Relay disagree,” she said.
New York City’s plan to implement the law was announced June 11. It would raise the minimum hourly wage for “app-based restaurant delivery workers” to $17.96 beginning July 12 and raise it again to $19.96 on April 1, 2025. According to the mayor’s office, these workers currently average $7.09 an hour in the city.
“Our delivery workers have consistently delivered for us — now, we are delivering for them,” New York City Mayor Eric Adams said when announcing the law. “This new minimum pay rate, up by almost $13/hour, will guarantee these workers and their families can earn a living, access greater economic stability, and help keep our city’s legendary restaurant industry thriving.”
On the day of the announcement, DoorDash responded with a blog post in which it said the policy will have unintended consequences and will undermine the workers it aims to support.
“As we repeatedly made clear, to meet these new demands of such an extreme minimum pay rate, platforms like ours will have to increase costs on each order or reduce services in New York City,” the company said in the post.
Featured News
FTC Takes On Prescription Drug Middlemen Over High Insulin Costs
Sep 20, 2024 by
CPI
EU’s Incoming Competition Head Pushes for Policy Shift to Support ‘European Champions
Sep 19, 2024 by
CPI
Google Challenges $217 Million Legal Fee Demand in Privacy Case
Sep 19, 2024 by
CPI
EU Moves to Enforce Apple’s Compliance with New Market Rules
Sep 19, 2024 by
CPI
California Attorney General Bonta Stands Firm Against Albertsons-Kroger Merger
Sep 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Canada & Mexico
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI
Competitive Convergence: Mexico’s 30-Year Quest for Antitrust Parity with its Northern Neighbor
Sep 3, 2024 by
Francisco Javier Núñez Melgoza
Competition and Digital Markets in North America: A Comparative Study of Antitrust Investigations in Mexico and the United States
Sep 3, 2024 by
Julio Garcia
Recent Antitrust Development in Mexico: COFECE’s Preliminary Report on Amazon and Mercado Libre
Sep 3, 2024 by
Alejandra Palacios Prieto
The Cost of Making COFECE Disappear
Sep 3, 2024 by
Mateo Fernández