
A groundbreaking settlement in the long-running legal battle against payments company Mastercard is facing scrutiny from a funder involved in the case, according to Law Gazette. The claim, led by former financial ombudsman Walter Merricks CBE, sought to recover £17 billion on behalf of an estimated 46 million UK consumers over allegations of excessive transactional fees.
The lawsuit, which was greenlit by the Supreme Court in 2020, marked a significant step in collective redress for consumers. However, late yesterday, news emerged that a settlement agreement had been reached, which could provide compensation worth between £40 and £50 to each consumer who participates, as stated by Boris Bronfentrinker, a partner at Willkie Farr & Gallagher and Merricks’ legal representative.
In a statement issued this morning, Merricks expressed satisfaction with the settlement after nearly a decade of litigation. “I am very pleased that after nearly nine years of litigation with Mastercard, I have agreed a settlement that I believe will deliver meaningful compensation to class members who chose to come forward to participate in the distribution of the damages,” Merricks said. He highlighted the significance of the case in demonstrating the effectiveness of the UK’s collective redress regime and added that he looks forward to presenting the settlement details to the Competition Appeal Tribunal for approval.
Read more: EU Probes Visa and Mastercard Over Impact of Payment Fees on Retailers
Mastercard Settlement Faces Challenge in Landmark Consumer Case
Mastercard, meanwhile, also expressed contentment with the agreement. “We are pleased to have reached an agreement in principle to put this case behind us,” a spokesperson said, emphasizing that the company remains focused on delivering a seamless and secure payment experience for its customers.
Despite the progress, Law Gazette reports that the settlement already faces a https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/
Source: Law Gazette
Featured News
Indian Ad Agencies Warned Against WhatsApp Discussions After Antitrust Raids
Apr 17, 2025 by
CPI
US Court Ruling Against Google Spurs Fresh Antitrust Tensions in Europe
Apr 17, 2025 by
CPI
AstraZeneca Accused of Stifling Biosimilar Competition for Rare Disease Drug
Apr 17, 2025 by
CPI
EU AI Act Technical Standards Delayed Until Next Year
Apr 17, 2025 by
CPI
Justice Department Appoints New Trustee to Oversee T-Mobile/Sprint Deal
Apr 17, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – The Airline Industry
Apr 10, 2025 by
CPI
Boosting Competition in International Aviation
Apr 10, 2025 by
Jeffrey N. Shane
Reshaping Competition Policy for the U.S. Airline Industry
Apr 10, 2025 by
Diana L. Moss
Algorithmic Collusion in the Skies: The Role of AI in Shaping Airline Competition
Apr 10, 2025 by
Qi Ge, Myongjin Kim & Nicholas Rupp
Competition in U.S. Airline Markets: Major Developments and Economic Insights
Apr 10, 2025 by
Germán Bet