A groundbreaking settlement in the long-running legal battle against payments company Mastercard is facing scrutiny from a funder involved in the case, according to Law Gazette. The claim, led by former financial ombudsman Walter Merricks CBE, sought to recover £17 billion on behalf of an estimated 46 million UK consumers over allegations of excessive transactional fees.
The lawsuit, which was greenlit by the Supreme Court in 2020, marked a significant step in collective redress for consumers. However, late yesterday, news emerged that a settlement agreement had been reached, which could provide compensation worth between £40 and £50 to each consumer who participates, as stated by Boris Bronfentrinker, a partner at Willkie Farr & Gallagher and Merricks’ legal representative.
In a statement issued this morning, Merricks expressed satisfaction with the settlement after nearly a decade of litigation. “I am very pleased that after nearly nine years of litigation with Mastercard, I have agreed a settlement that I believe will deliver meaningful compensation to class members who chose to come forward to participate in the distribution of the damages,” Merricks said. He highlighted the significance of the case in demonstrating the effectiveness of the UK’s collective redress regime and added that he looks forward to presenting the settlement details to the Competition Appeal Tribunal for approval.
Read more: EU Probes Visa and Mastercard Over Impact of Payment Fees on Retailers
Mastercard Settlement Faces Challenge in Landmark Consumer Case
Mastercard, meanwhile, also expressed contentment with the agreement. “We are pleased to have reached an agreement in principle to put this case behind us,” a spokesperson said, emphasizing that the company remains focused on delivering a seamless and secure payment experience for its customers.
Despite the progress, Law Gazette reports that the settlement already faces a https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/
Source: Law Gazette
Featured News
Massachusetts AG Sues Insulin Makers and PBMs Over Alleged Price-Fixing Scheme
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Apple and Amazon Avoid Mass Lawsuit in UK Over Alleged Collusion
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Top Agent Network Drops Antitrust Suit Against National Association of Realtors
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Weil, Gotshal & Manges Strengthens Antitrust Practice with New Partner
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Russian Court Imposes Hefty Fine on Google for Non-Compliance with Content Removal Orders
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand