House Financial Services Committee Chairwoman Maxine Waters told Reuters on Thursday that she is prepared to subpoena FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried if he does not agree to appear before the panel next week and she is working out the best way to do it.
“We’ve made it clear that we want Sam at our hearing on Dec. 13. If he does not cooperate, then we are prepared to subpoena,” Waters said in an interview in the U.S. Capitol.
Regulators around the globe, including in the Bahamas, where FTX is based, and in the United States, are investigating the role of FTX’s top executives including Bankman-Fried in the firm’s stunning collapse, Reuters has previously reported. The crypto exchange filed for bankruptcy last month after a liquidity crisis that saw at least $1 billion of customer funds vanish.
Prosecutors and regulators have not charged Bankman-Fried with any crime.
Bankman-Fried missed a Thursday evening deadline to respond to a Senate Banking Committee request to testify at a hearing, raising the possibility of a subpoena, Axios reported.
Waters said she has the authority to issue a subpoena herself but could put it to a committee vote, adding she would first work out the procedure with Representative Patrick McHenry, the Republican lawmaker who will chair the panel when his party assumes control of the House in January.
She said no decision has been made so far. “I could really do it myself. We’d probably do a vote,” she said. “I have to work it out with Mr. McHenry how we do it. But we will issue a subpoena.”
“Either he participates or not. And that’s when we make our decision,” Waters said. “It’s only proper and right, and makes good sense, to say we want you here.”
She declined to say whether Bankman-Fried would be required to appear in person or could testify by video link.
A spokesperson for Bankman-Fried declined to comment. McHenry’s office was not immediately available for comment.
Featured News
FTC and State Attorneys General Sue John Deere Over Repair Restrictions in Antitrust Case
Jan 15, 2025 by
CPI
Enbridge Wins Legal Battle Against Ducere’s Antitrust Allegations
Jan 15, 2025 by
CPI
GOP Pushes for Antitrust Authority Consolidation Under DOJ in New Legislation
Jan 15, 2025 by
CPI
Canadian Government Approves Bunge-Viterra Merger with Conditions
Jan 15, 2025 by
CPI
SEC Sues Elon Musk Over Delayed Disclosure of Twitter Stock Ownership
Jan 15, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand