A Swedish state-run pension fund sued Activision Blizzard Inc. and Microsoft Corp., claiming their planned $69 billion merger was rigged to exploit the beleaguered gaming giant’s sexual harassment crisis and protect its CEO.
The 205-page complaint also targets embattled Activision chief Bobby Kotick, plus current and ex-members of its board. It accuses them of engineering an underpriced deal in exchange for terms allowing Kotick to stay at the helm, at least until the transaction closes after a drawn-out regulatory review.
Knowing Activision and Kotick were “weak and wounded,” Microsoft used the leverage created by the scandal to acquire Activision “at a bargain price,” at an inopportune time, and following a sham process, according to the proposed class action. It was made public Nov. 10 in Delaware’s Chancery Court.
Read more: EU Watchdog Probe Microsoft’s $69 Billion Activision Bid
“Microsoft knowingly exploited the harassment scandal and its commercial leverage over Activision precisely to offer Kotick a way to save his own skin,” the lawsuit says. “It conspired with Kotick and the board to help them evade the personal and professional consequences of that scandal.”
Joe Christinat, a spokesman for Activision, defended the transaction Monday.
“This is a great deal for shareholders,” Christinat told Bloomberg Law. “We garnered 98% approval of votes cast. The board went through a thorough process to decide the right move for employees, shareholders, and players.”
A spokesperson for Microsoft told Bloomberg Law in a statement that “our proposed acquisition of Activision Blizzard was negotiated lawfully and fairly.”
Featured News
Synopsys Secures EU Approval for $35 Billion Ansys Acquisition
Jan 13, 2025 by
CPI
New UK Legislation to Combat Ticket Resale and Algorithmic Price-Fixing
Jan 12, 2025 by
CPI
Supreme Court Justices Grill TikTok’s Lawyer in National Security Case
Jan 12, 2025 by
CPI
FTC, DOJ Weigh Antitrust Issues in Musk’s OpenAI Case
Jan 12, 2025 by
CPI
UK Trial Begins as Apple Defends App Store Fees in £1.5 Billion Case
Jan 12, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand