Benjamin Edelman, Julian Wright, Jan 30, 2015
In connecting buyers to sellers, some two-sided platforms require that sellers offer their lowest prices through the platform, disallowing lower prices for direct sales or sales through competing platforms. In this article, we explore the various contexts where such restrictions have arisen, then consider effects on competition, entry, and efficiency. Where there are plausible mitigating factors, such as efficiencies from platforms’ price restrictions, we explore those rationales and compare them to the harms. We identify a set of responses for competition policy, look at experiences to date, and suggest some future attempts to improve the functioning of these markets.
Featured News
SCOTUS Seeks Cumulus Response in Nielsen Antitrust Fight
Nov 9, 2026 by
CPI
Delta Air Lines Seeks Dismissal of Washington Noncompete Disclosure Suit
Nov 9, 2026 by
CPI
South Korea Hits Coupang, Woowa Brothers With $464 Million in Antitrust Fines
Nov 9, 2026 by
CPI
Turkey Widens Hazelnut Price-Fixing Probe to Ferrero, Six Other Companies
Nov 8, 2026 by
CPI
Medtronic Sued Over Alleged Monopoly in Surgical Stapler Market
Nov 8, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Exclusive Dealing
Oct 25, 2026 by
CPI
Exclusive Dealing Without Exclusivity: Screening Contracts, Loyalty Rebates, and the Limits of Antitrust Tests
Oct 25, 2026 by
David Martimort & Jérôme Pouyet
When Competition for Exclusivity Raises Prices: Rebates, Pricing Rules, and the Insulin Puzzle
Oct 25, 2026 by
Daniel P. O’Brien & Greg Shaffer
Why Leaving the Door Open Can Be (Much) Worse Than Closing It: Share-Based Requirements, Buyer-Specific Costs, and Foreclosure
Oct 25, 2026 by
Zhijun Chen & Greg Shaffer
Antitrust Chronicle® – EU Merger Guidelines
Oct 19, 2026 by
CPI