Benjamin Edelman, Julian Wright, Jan 30, 2015
In connecting buyers to sellers, some two-sided platforms require that sellers offer their lowest prices through the platform, disallowing lower prices for direct sales or sales through competing platforms. In this article, we explore the various contexts where such restrictions have arisen, then consider effects on competition, entry, and efficiency. Where there are plausible mitigating factors, such as efficiencies from platforms’ price restrictions, we explore those rationales and compare them to the harms. We identify a set of responses for competition policy, look at experiences to date, and suggest some future attempts to improve the functioning of these markets.
Featured News
Belgian Competition Authority Launches Inquiry into Live Nation’s Acquisition of Pukkelpop Festival
Nov 12, 2025 by
CPI
UK Competition Regulator Hit by Further Boardroom Departures
Nov 11, 2025 by
CPI
Parker-Hannifin Bets $9.25 Billion on Industrial Filtration Growth
Nov 11, 2025 by
CPI
Judge Grants Preliminary Approval to Tyson’s $85 Million Pork Price-Fixing Settlement
Nov 11, 2025 by
CPI
Senate Bill to End Shutdown Includes Extension to Cyber-Information Sharing Protections
Nov 11, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Costs of Consolidation
Oct 26, 2025 by
CPI
Does Merger Enforcement Protect Consumers from the Long-Term Costs of Consolidation?
Oct 26, 2025 by
Diana L. Moss
“Praying for Inflation”: How Market Concentration Facilitates Inflationary Pressures
Oct 26, 2025 by
John Kwoka & Muhammad Shabanpour
Unpacking the Remedy: The Hidden Costs of Merger Remedies and the Economist’s Role in Getting Them Right
Oct 26, 2025 by
Sam R. Carless, Mary Coleman & David Weiskopf
Why Industry Consolidation Causes More Concern Than It Should
Oct 26, 2025 by
Michael Noel