Benjamin Edelman, Julian Wright, Jan 30, 2015
In connecting buyers to sellers, some two-sided platforms require that sellers offer their lowest prices through the platform, disallowing lower prices for direct sales or sales through competing platforms. In this article, we explore the various contexts where such restrictions have arisen, then consider effects on competition, entry, and efficiency. Where there are plausible mitigating factors, such as efficiencies from platforms’ price restrictions, we explore those rationales and compare them to the harms. We identify a set of responses for competition policy, look at experiences to date, and suggest some future attempts to improve the functioning of these markets.
Featured News
Paramount Seeks to Address Regulatory Concerns Over Warner Bros. Discovery Deal
Jun 8, 2026 by
CPI
Italy Ends Meta WhatsApp AI Probe as EU Investigation Expands
Jun 8, 2026 by
CPI
Both Left and Right in Washington Eye Public Equity Stakes in AI Companies
Jun 8, 2026 by
CPI
Democrats Roll Out Wave of AI Bills as Voter Concerns Mount
Jun 8, 2026 by
CPI
House Judiciary Committee Report Accuses NFL of Misusing Antitrust Exemption
Jun 8, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – (Geo)Political Antitrust
May 28, 2026 by
CPI
Competition Policy in Turbulent Geopolitical Times
May 28, 2026 by
Christophe Carugati & Annabelle Gawer
The New Political Determinants of U.S. Antitrust Policy
May 28, 2026 by
Aziz Z. Huq
The Geopolitical Rewiring of Antitrust
May 28, 2026 by
Hayane C. Dahmen
Three Strikes Against Political Antitrust
May 28, 2026 by
Nolan McCarty & Sepehr Shahshahani