Eliana Garces, Apr 01, 2010
Interesting questions are being asked about the policy implications of relaxing commonly held assumptions about how people make decisions. If consumers are not always rationally maximizing some kind of utility function, can we still claim that their decisions are always in their own best interest? And should this be a policy concern at all? We commonly rely on the competitive process to produce the market outcomes that are the most favorable to consumers. In a model of rational behavior, firms in a competitive environment compete mostly on the merits and the market outcome is efficient and welfare-maximizing. Does this result continue to hold when the rationality assumption about consumer behavior is relaxed?
Featured News
SAP Proposes Concessions to Resolve EU Antitrust Probe
Nov 16, 2025 by
CPI
Google’s Final Appeal in Ad Tech Antitrust Case Pushed to Late November
Nov 16, 2025 by
CPI
German Court Hits Google With €572 Million Damages Over Market Abuse
Nov 16, 2025 by
CPI
China Unveils Draft Antitrust Guidance for Internet Platforms
Nov 16, 2025 by
CPI
Google Submits Plan to Address EU Adtech Antitrust Violations
Nov 16, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Entertainment & Culture
Nov 13, 2025 by
CPI
Non-Playable Character: Competition Law Enforcement in the Video Game Market
Nov 13, 2025 by
Robin S. Crauthers
Gerrymandering Sports Entertainment Product Markets
Nov 13, 2025 by
Jodi Balsam
Redistribution via Competition Policy: A Case Study of Creative Industries
Nov 13, 2025 by
Friso Bostoen
Sports Governing Bodies vs. Antitrust 0 – 4? Sport and Competition Economics Comments on the Recent Judgements of the European Court of Justice
Nov 13, 2025 by
Oliver Budzinski