Herbert Hovenkamp, Apr 01, 2006
The success of the Areeda-Turner test for predatory pricing and the U.S. Supreme Court’s adoption of demanding proof requirements in its 1993 Brooke Group decision have made it very difficult for plaintiffs to win conventional predatory pricing claims. While many challenges to exclusionary pricing continue to be made, the legal theory has evolved away from classical predation to a variety of other theories. This paper examines the state of the law of both conventional predatory pricing and these recent variants and offers some recommendations.
Featured News
Senate Passes Sweeping College Sports Overhaul in Bipartisan Vote
Sep 28, 2026 by
CPI
Apple Ordered to Pay $5.7 Billion in Haptic Technology Patent Case
Sep 28, 2026 by
CPI
LinkedIn Seeks Dismissal of Revised US Antitrust Claims
Sep 28, 2026 by
CPI
Booking.com Drops External Price Checks From Key Program Under EU Digital Rules
Sep 28, 2026 by
CPI
Ofcom Blocks Openreach Fibre Discount on UK Competition Concerns
Sep 28, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – National Security
Sep 22, 2026 by
CPI
National Security in U.S. Antitrust Enforcement: Toward a More Disciplined Framework
Sep 22, 2026 by
Rod Rosenstein & Timothy Finley
The Department of War’s M&A Review Guidance: What Companies in the Defense Industry Need to Know
Sep 22, 2026 by
Eric Stocking & Paul Ney
National Security, Resilience and the Boundaries of Merger Control
Sep 22, 2026 by
Beatriz Marques
National Security and Competition: Building Resilient Telecommunications Networks
Sep 22, 2026 by
Roslyn Layton