By: Edd Gent (MIT Technology Review)
Suddenly, “open source” has become the latest trend in AI circles. Meta has committed to developing open-source artificial general intelligence, while Elon Musk is taking legal action against OpenAI for its lack of open-source AI models.
Simultaneously, an increasing number of tech leaders and companies are positioning themselves as advocates for open source.
However, a fundamental issue arises: there is no consensus on the definition of “open-source AI.”
On the surface, open-source AI holds the promise of a future where anyone can participate in its development, potentially accelerating innovation, enhancing transparency, and empowering users with greater control over systems poised to impact various aspects of society. But what exactly constitutes open-source AI, and what attributes render an AI model ineligible?
These questions carry significant implications for the technology’s future. Without a universally agreed-upon definition, powerful companies could exploit the concept to align with their own interests, potentially reinforcing the dominance of current industry leaders.
Stepping into this debate is the Open Source Initiative (OSI), which positions itself as the authority on what qualifies as open source. Established in 1998, this nonprofit organization oversees the Open Source Definition, a widely recognized set of criteria determining whether software can be labeled as open source.
The OSI has now convened a diverse group of 70 individuals, including researchers, legal experts, policymakers, activists, and representatives from major tech firms like Meta, Google, and Amazon, to craft a functional definition of open-source AI.
Featured News
Lawmaker Probes FTC and EU’s Role in Amazon’s Failed iRobot Acquisition
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
FTC to Approve Exxon’s $64 Billion Deal with Pioneer Resources, Excludes
May 1, 2024 by
CPI
UK Competition Watchdog Raises Alarm Over Nvidia’s ARM Takeover
May 1, 2024 by
CPI
Sen. Klobuchar Urges Regulators to Probe Collusion in Healthcare Pricing
May 1, 2024 by
CPI
Multiple States Join Tennessee’s Antitrust Lawsuit Against NCAA Over NIL Rules
May 1, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI