David Park, William Rooney, Apr 19, 2007
The term two-sided market sounds strange to the antitrust lawyer´s ear. Antitrust markets typically are not described as having sides. They consist of a relevant product or set of products, cover a geographic area, and include transactions between buyers and sellers at a particular level of distribution. Although most market participants buy inputs and sell outputs, they usually buy in the market for the input and sell in the market for the output, not compete in a two-sided market. Still, the growing and informative literature on two-sided platforms, businesses, and markets has much to offer antitrust law. That literature emphasizes that the demand for otherwise distinct products or services may in fact be linked and that a competitive-effects analysis cannot myopically ignore that linkage. To the extent that the two-sided market literature improves competitive-effects analysis, it improves the fundamental purpose of antitrust law. This essay briefly discusses the importance of acknowledging linked demand for, and relationships among, otherwise distinct products or services, as recommended by the two-sided market literature, with respect to competitive-effects assessments and market definition. We also observe that recognizing linked demand and interrelationships among products or services facilitates the application of legal rules in antitrust cases.
Featured News
New York Ski Mountain Sale Resolves Long-Running Antitrust Fight
Oct 18, 2026 by
CPI
Italy Fines E-Scooter Operators €2.7 Million Over Free-Ride Restrictions in Rome
Oct 18, 2026 by
CPI
Google Play Antitrust Lawyers Denied $85 Million Fee Request by US Judge
Oct 18, 2026 by
CPI
SoftBank Weighs $18 Billion Allied Universal Takeover
Oct 18, 2026 by
CPI
Anthropic Proposes AI Safety Bill Giving US Government Power to Block High-Risk Models
Oct 18, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – EU Merger Guidelines
Oct 19, 2026 by
CPI
In Praise of Theories of Benefits
Oct 19, 2026 by
Cyril Hariton & Pierre Regibeau
Closing the Efficiencies Gap
Oct 19, 2026 by
Kasia Czapracka & Marika Harjula
Analysis of Dynamic Trade-Offs Under the New Guidelines: Would Cases Like Amazon/Irobot Turn Out Differently?
Oct 19, 2026 by
Oliver Latham, Sam Marden, Saul Mendelsohn & Serge Moresi
Exploitative Portfolio Effects In EU Merger Control: From Mars/Kellanova to the Draft Merger Guidelines
Oct 19, 2026 by
Niels Baeten, Danette Chan & Elizabeth Malik