TikTok and its parent company, ByteDance, have filed an emergency motion with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, seeking to temporarily block a law that would force ByteDance to divest its U.S. operations of TikTok by January 19, 2025, or face a nationwide ban. The companies are requesting a delay while the U.S. Supreme Court considers reviewing the case, according to Reuters.
In their motion, the companies warned that enforcing the law would effectively shut down TikTok, a platform with over 170 million monthly U.S. users, just before a new presidential administration takes office. The filing emphasizes the platform’s significance as a major venue for public discourse and entertainment, per Reuters.
This appeal follows a decision on Friday, when a three-judge panel upheld the legislation requiring the divestiture. The ruling grants sweeping powers to the U.S. government to ban foreign-owned applications, citing concerns about data collection from American users. This echoes similar efforts in 2020 when then-President Donald Trump sought to ban both TikTok and Tencent-owned WeChat, though courts blocked those moves.
Related: US Appeals Court Upholds TikTok Divestment Law, Paving Way for Potential Ban
Lawyers for ByteDance and TikTok argue that the possibility of the Supreme Court overturning the lower court’s decision is substantial enough to justify a temporary delay. According to the companies, this pause would also allow President-elect Donald Trump’s incoming administration time to review its stance on the issue. Trump, who takes office on January 20, has previously indicated opposition to banning TikTok.
ByteDance has noted that the current decision creates uncertainty about whether TikTok could secure a 90-day extension of the January deadline. To qualify, ByteDance would need to demonstrate significant progress toward a divestiture — a requirement the company may struggle to meet.
President Joe Biden, in the final weeks of his administration, holds the authority to grant the extension or enforce the looming deadline. The handoff between administrations adds another layer of complexity to the case.
The law underpinning the divestment order is part of broader U.S. efforts to mitigate potential risks posed by foreign-owned applications. The government has expressed concerns about TikTok’s data practices and alleged links to the Chinese government, a point ByteDance has consistently denied.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Federal Judge Signals Revisions Likely in DOJ Case Targeting Live Nation Monopoly
Jan 22, 2025 by
CPI
American Airlines and JetBlue Agree to $2 Million Legal Fee Settlement with U.S. States
Jan 22, 2025 by
CPI
Federal Judge Dismisses Class Action Alleging Inflated Yacht Commission Fees
Jan 22, 2025 by
CPI
Doug Gurr Appointed Interim Chairman of UK’s Competition Authority
Jan 22, 2025 by
CPI
LinkedIn Faces Lawsuit Over Alleged Misuse of Customer Data for AI Training
Jan 22, 2025 by
Amanda Adams
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Pharmacy Benefit Managers
Jan 20, 2025 by
CPI
Untangling the PBM Mess
Jan 20, 2025 by
Kent Bernard
Using Data, Not Anecdotes, to Analyze Criticisms of Pharmacy Benefit Managers
Jan 20, 2025 by
Dennis Carlton
Vertical Integration and PBMs: What, Me Worry?
Jan 20, 2025 by
Lawton Robert Burns & Bradley Fluegel
The Economics of Benefit Management in Prescription-Drug Markets
Jan 20, 2025 by
Casey B. Mulligan