
TikTok and its parent company, ByteDance, have filed an emergency motion with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, seeking to temporarily block a law that would force ByteDance to divest its U.S. operations of TikTok by January 19, 2025, or face a nationwide ban. The companies are requesting a delay while the U.S. Supreme Court considers reviewing the case, according to Reuters.
In their motion, the companies warned that enforcing the law would effectively shut down TikTok, a platform with over 170 million monthly U.S. users, just before a new presidential administration takes office. The filing emphasizes the platform’s significance as a major venue for public discourse and entertainment, per Reuters.
This appeal follows a decision on Friday, when a three-judge panel upheld the legislation requiring the divestiture. The ruling grants sweeping powers to the U.S. government to ban foreign-owned applications, citing concerns about data collection from American users. This echoes similar efforts in 2020 when then-President Donald Trump sought to ban both TikTok and Tencent-owned WeChat, though courts blocked those moves.
Related: US Appeals Court Upholds TikTok Divestment Law, Paving Way for Potential Ban
Lawyers for ByteDance and TikTok argue that the possibility of the Supreme Court overturning the lower court’s decision is substantial enough to justify a temporary delay. According to the companies, this pause would also allow President-elect Donald Trump’s incoming administration time to review its stance on the issue. Trump, who takes office on January 20, has previously indicated opposition to banning TikTok.
ByteDance has noted that the current decision creates uncertainty about whether TikTok could secure a 90-day extension of the January deadline. To qualify, ByteDance would need to demonstrate significant progress toward a divestiture — a requirement the company may struggle to meet.
President Joe Biden, in the final weeks of his administration, holds the authority to grant the extension or enforce the looming deadline. The handoff between administrations adds another layer of complexity to the case.
The law underpinning the divestment order is part of broader U.S. efforts to mitigate potential risks posed by foreign-owned applications. The government has expressed concerns about TikTok’s data practices and alleged links to the Chinese government, a point ByteDance has consistently denied.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
CFPB Allows Some Operations to Resume Amid Legal Challenge
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
NASCAR Accuses Michael Jordan’s Race Team of Illegal Cartel in Legal Battle
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
Healthcare Providers Sue BCBS Insurers Over Alleged Collusion
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
Indian Distributors File Antitrust Case Against Quick-Delivery Giants
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
EU Lawmakers Send Letter Rejecting Claims of Bias in Digital Rules
Mar 6, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li