An Uber customer who launched an antitrust lawsuit against the rideshare giant in 2015 asked a Manhattan federal judge on Friday, May 22, to overturn the decision, according to a Reuters report.
Spencer Meyer told the federal judge that the arbitrator ruled in Uber’s favor because he was scared. Meyer’s lawsuit accused Uber of conspiring with drivers to coordinate “surge pricing” by charging customers based on the app’s algorithm. The suit asked for a nationwide ban on surge pricing.
Les Weinstein, the appointed arbitrator, ruled in Uber’s favor on February 22 and the case was dismissed. Friday’s filings reportedly indicate that Weinstein based his decision on “evident partiality,” the report stated. “I must say I act out of fear. My fear is if I ruled Uber illegal, I would need security. I wouldn’t be able to walk the streets at night. People would be after me,” the transcript excerpt stated. It was attached to the filing.
Weinstein also reportedly questioned if he could legally ban surge pricing across the country. Another lawsuit against Uber alleges that the company engaged in deceitful practices to drive its competitor Sidecar Technologies out of business in 2015. The lawsuit brought by SC Innovations, Sidecar’s successor, is moving forward in front of Judge Joseph Spero in San Francisco.
The lawsuit alleges that Sidecar, founded in 2012, was the first company to offer ride-sharing but was muscled out of the business by Uber’s reportedly aggressive tactics.
The allegations in the suit include that Uber started lowering fares for passengers and offering incentives to attract drivers. Then the company used “surge” and “dynamic” pricing, the lawsuit claims, and other tactics as a way to cut driver pay and raise prices for riders.
The lawsuit also accused Uber of covertly booking and canceling rides on competitors’ apps.
Full Content: The National
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
PepsiCo Sued Over Alleged Price Discrimination Involving Walmart
Jan 19, 2025 by
CPI
Regulators Approve Conditions for Multibillion-Dollar Oil Mergers
Jan 19, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Reaches Settlement with Private Equity Firm Over Antitrust Allegations in Texas
Jan 19, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Raises Antitrust Concerns Over Big Tech’s AI Partnerships
Jan 19, 2025 by
CPI
MultiPlan and Insurers Move to Dismiss Antitrust Allegations Amid Growing Legal Challenges
Jan 19, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand