Drug company Tiofarma has admitted that it took part in an agreement that resulted in significant price hikes for an essential medicine, reported the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA).
This means that 2 of the 3 companies under investigation by the CMA have now admitted to an allegation that they illegally took part in an anti-competitive agreement.
The CMA has alleged, and provisionally found, that the agreement between Aspen, Tiofarma, and Amilco contributed to the price of fludrocortisone acetate tablets supplied to the NHS increasing by up to 1800%. Fludrocortisone is a life-saving medicine that thousands of patients rely on to treat adrenal insufficiency, commonly known as Addison’s Disease.
In October 2019, the CMA issued a “statement of objections” provisionally finding that the 3 suppliers had broken the law. The CMA’s provisional finding was that the agreement involved Tiofarma and Amilco staying out of the UK fludrocortisone market so that Aspen could maintain its position as the sole UK supplier. The CMA also provisionally found that, in exchange, Tiofarma was given the right to be the sole manufacturer of the drug for direct sale in the UK, and Amilco received a 30% share of the increased prices that Aspen was able to charge.
Featured News
PepsiCo Sued Over Alleged Price Discrimination Involving Walmart
Jan 19, 2025 by
CPI
Regulators Approve Conditions for Multibillion-Dollar Oil Mergers
Jan 19, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Reaches Settlement with Private Equity Firm Over Antitrust Allegations in Texas
Jan 19, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Raises Antitrust Concerns Over Big Tech’s AI Partnerships
Jan 19, 2025 by
CPI
MultiPlan and Insurers Move to Dismiss Antitrust Allegations Amid Growing Legal Challenges
Jan 19, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand