The Court of Appeal in London ruled on Wednesday that Britain’s antitrust regulator, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), can compel companies based outside the United Kingdom to provide information. This ruling comes as a result of a case initiated by German carmakers BMW and Volkswagen, challenging the CMA’s authority to request documents and information for an investigation into alleged anti-competitive conduct in the recycling of old or written-off vehicles.
Bayerische Motoren Werke AG (BMW), the ultimate parent company of the BMW group, faced a fine of £30,000 ($37,991) in December 2022, with an additional daily penalty of £15,000, for failing to comply with the CMA’s information requests related to the recycling investigation. The Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) overturned this fine last year, asserting that the CMA lacked the power to demand information held outside the UK from companies situated beyond its jurisdiction. Volkswagen’s legal challenge to a CMA request for information was also successful in the CAT.
Read more: UK’s CMA Increasingly Hostile to Business, Says INEOS Chair
However, the Court of Appeal has now reversed the CAT’s decision, emphasizing the critical need for the CMA to have the authority to request information from companies located outside the UK. The court argued that without such power, there would be “a gaping lacuna” in the CMA’s ability to investigate and address anti-competitive practices that could harm the United Kingdom market.
The ruling highlighted the potential for a perverse incentive if the CMA could not extend its reach to overseas companies. It suggested that such a limitation would create an environment in which conspirators might relocate offshore to organize cartels specifically aimed at harming the UK market, rendering them nearly immune from investigation.
“The absence of such a power would create a perverse incentive for conspirators to move offshore to organise cartels directed at harming the United Kingdom market, and they would be more or less immune from investigation,” the court stated in its written ruling.
This decision is expected to have far-reaching implications, reinforcing the CMA’s ability to investigate and address anti-competitive behavior, even when involving companies headquartered outside the UK.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Apple and Amazon Avoid Mass Lawsuit in UK Over Alleged Collusion
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Top Agent Network Drops Antitrust Suit Against National Association of Realtors
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Weil, Gotshal & Manges Strengthens Antitrust Practice with New Partner
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Russian Court Imposes Hefty Fine on Google for Non-Compliance with Content Removal Orders
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
UK Watchdog Targets Google’s Search Monopoly in First Major Digital Rules Probe
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand