United States v. Google is often described as a behavioral economics victory in antitrust. This Note argues that the label did more work than the method. The liability theory relied on three analytical shortcuts: (i) treating status quo bias as determinative in a low-friction distribution environment without bounding conditions or magnitude; (ii) re-describing default placement as “exclusive” foreclosure without decomposing how much demand the default actually diverts in the but-for world; a
...THIS ARTICLE IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR IP ADDRESS 18.97.14.82
Please verify email or join us to access premium content!