Anthem vowed Thursday to appeal a federal judge’s move to halt its planned takeover of Cigna.
A federal judge in DC made the decision Wednesday, saying it would violate antitrust law for the second- and third-largest health insurers in the US to combine.
The deal, valued at $54 billion when it was announced in 2015, would make the combined company the largest health care provider in the nation.
But if the merger plans fall through, Anthem will owe Cigna a $1.85 billion breakup fee, according to the terms of their agreement.
Anthem is determined to ensure Wednesday’s decision isn’t the final word on the issue. The company said in a statement Thursday that it “promptly intends to file a notice of appeal and request an expedited hearing.”
Anthem added that the deal “was approved by over 99% of the votes cast by the shareholders of both companies.”
Cigna said in a statement posted early Thursday that it “intends to carefully review the opinion and evaluate its options.”
Anthem has argued that the deal would save health insurance customers over $2 billion in medical costs because Cigna customers will be able to access discounts that Anthem is able to offer its customers.
In the order issued Wednesday, Washington DC District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson wrote that Cigna may not be able to offer steeper discounts, but it seeks to keep its customers healthier.
“Cigna has sought to differentiate itself with its approach towards reducing costs by increasing health,” the judge wrote. “For this reason, some customers prefer Cigna notwithstanding its discount disadvantage, and there was some testimony from medical personnel that the approach is working.”
Full Content: Gazette
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Automakers Challenge Maine’s Right to Repair Law
Feb 12, 2025 by
CPI
Senators Urged to Expedite Gail Slater’s Confirmation as DOJ Antitrust Chief
Feb 11, 2025 by
CPI
Former Michigan Asphalt Executive Pleads Guilty in Bid-Rigging Scheme
Feb 11, 2025 by
CPI
Ballard Spahr Expands Litigation Team with Addition of Antitrust Attorney in Seattle
Feb 11, 2025 by
CPI
Portuguese Court Overturns €225 Million Fine for Banking Collusion Due to Statute of Limitations
Feb 11, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – International Criminal Enforcement
Jan 23, 2025 by
CPI
The Antitrust Division’s Recent Work to Combat International Cartels
Jan 23, 2025 by
Emma Burnham & Benjamin Christenson
Information Sharing: The New Frontier of U.S. Antitrust Enforcement
Jan 23, 2025 by
Brian P. Quinn, Casey Kovarik & Michael Tubach
The Key Role of Guidelines on Exchanges of Information Among Competitors and the Divergent Transatlantic Paths
Jan 23, 2025 by
Rosa Abrantes-Metz & Albert Metz
Leniency, Whistleblowers, and Compliance
Jan 23, 2025 by
Richard Powers, Tara O’Malley & Cory Gordon