A PYMNTS Company

US: Celgene backs out of a $55m antitrust settlement

By  |  January 9, 2020
drugs

In an unusual move, Celgene has backed out of a $55 million settlement with patients and payers over allegations it illegally blocked competition to multiple myeloma meds Thalomid and Revlimid. With the decision, the company will go back to fighting claims from thousands of patients and payers, who allege billions in damages.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    Celgene, now part of Bristol-Myers Squibb under last year’s massive merger, originally agreed to the deal in July and backed out on December 23, plaintiffs’ lawyers say. Patient advocate David Mitchell, plus several union pension funds, brought the class-action lawsuit.

    When the sides agreed to their $55 million deal, the agreement included stipulations that Celgene could back out if certain plaintiffs didn’t opt in. In all, more than 8,000 patients and 800 payers opted in to the original settlement. But 80 plaintiffs opted out in order to bring their own lawsuits, and Celgene rescinded the agreement based on those opt-outs, plaintiffs’ lawyers say.

    Now, the drugmaker will have to defend against claims in a class that includes about 9,000 plaintiffs.

    The case centers on allegations that Celgene refused to sell samples of Thalomid and Revlimid to deter copycat development and inked supply agreements to restrict the distribution of Thalomid’s active ingredient. Further, the company allegedly filed sham patent challenges as another way to block competition.

    Plaintiffs say they could’ve saved more than $3 billion if a generic had been approved earlier, but Celgene’s actions blocked that possibility.

    Celgene’s move is unusual, experts say. The “rescission provisions are common in class settlements, but I have never heard of a defendant ever actually rescinding an agreement,” Melinda Coolidge, an attorney for the plaintiffs, said in a statement.