What, exactly, is the effect of the highly debated practice of cable bundling on consumers? According to one US law professor, cable customers are overpaying $34 billion a year due to channel tying and bundling. Professor Warren Grimes, from Southwestern Law School, has released a new article in which he calculates the overage fees for unwatched channels consumers are forced to buy as part of a package. The paper, “The Cable Television Case: A Giant Step Toward Irrelevancy?”, comes in the wake of a failed class action filed in 2007 against television programmers; Grimes was part of the plaintiffs’ legal counsel during his time as litigator at O’Melveny & Myers. The professor reaches his $34 billion number based on cable practices in Canada, where, according to the author, consumers pay about $342 less per year for the same television they would receive in the US.
Featured News
Apple Opens Early Settlement Discussions With DOJ
Jul 17, 2026 by
CPI
South Korean Steelmaker POSCO Expands Supplier Support Pact With Antitrust Regulator
Jul 16, 2026 by
CPI
FCC’s Carr Criticizes California-Led Bid to Block Paramount-Warner Bros. Discovery Deal
Jul 16, 2026 by
CPI
EU Top Court Upholds Antitrust Powers to Seize Corporate Emails
Jul 16, 2026 by
CPI
Uber Launches $14.8 Billion Bid for Delivery Hero in Landmark Food Delivery Deal
Jul 16, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Agentic AI & Antitrust
Jul 16, 2026 by
CPI
AI Agents and Collusion: The Two Faces of Agentic AI
Jul 16, 2026 by
Giovanna Massarotto
Agentic AI’s Regulatory Conundrum
Jul 16, 2026 by
Anant Raut
Inter-AI-Agent Competition
Jul 16, 2026 by
Stefan Thomas
Navigating the Increasing Regulatory Scrutiny of AI-Pricing Tools: Competition and Other Emerging Risks
Jul 16, 2026 by
Mark Krotoski & Vinny Sidhu