What, exactly, is the effect of the highly debated practice of cable bundling on consumers? According to one US law professor, cable customers are overpaying $34 billion a year due to channel tying and bundling. Professor Warren Grimes, from Southwestern Law School, has released a new article in which he calculates the overage fees for unwatched channels consumers are forced to buy as part of a package. The paper, “The Cable Television Case: A Giant Step Toward Irrelevancy?”, comes in the wake of a failed class action filed in 2007 against television programmers; Grimes was part of the plaintiffs’ legal counsel during his time as litigator at O’Melveny & Myers. The professor reaches his $34 billion number based on cable practices in Canada, where, according to the author, consumers pay about $342 less per year for the same television they would receive in the US.
Full Content: Thomson Reuters
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
South Africa Approves Canal+ MultiChoice Deal
May 21, 2025 by
CPI
WhatsApp Co-Founder Undermines Antitrust Allegations Against Meta in Court Testimony
May 21, 2025 by
CPI
OpenAI Acquires Jony Ive’s io for $6.4B to Pioneer Post-Smartphone Devices
May 21, 2025 by
CPI
Dior Commits €2 Million to Labor Initiatives in Italian Antitrust Settlement
May 21, 2025 by
CPI
Indonesia’s Antitrust Watchdog Probes Potential Risks of Grab-GoTo Merger
May 21, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Industrial Policy
May 21, 2025 by
CPI
Industrial Strategy and the Role of Competition – Taking a Business Lens
May 21, 2025 by
Marcus Bokkerink
Industrial Policy, Antitrust, and Economic Growth: Some Observations
May 21, 2025 by
David S. Evans
Bolder by Design: Crafting Pro-Competitive Industrial Policies For Complex Challenges
May 21, 2025 by
Antonio Capobianco & Beatriz Marques
Competition-Friendly Industrial Policy
May 21, 2025 by
Philippe Aghion, Mathias Dewatripont & Patrick Legros