The US Federal Trade Commission said it had approved with conditions the proposed $482.7 million merger of office supply distributors Staples Inc and Essendant, reported The Wall Street Journal
The two companies have agreed to a settlement as part of the deal in order to resolve the FTC’s allegations that the deal may have harmed competition in the market for office supplies sold to SMBs. Specifically, Staples would have access to commercially sensitive business information on Essendant’s reseller customers, and those resellers’ end customers, which could potentially allow Staples to offer higher prices than it otherwise would when bidding against a reseller for an end customer’s business.
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
US Jury Rejects Musk’s Claims Against OpenAI in High-Stakes AI Trial
May 18, 2026 by
CPI
Texas Targets Meatpacking Giants Amid Rising Beef Costs
May 18, 2026 by
CPI
Missouri Cannabis Giant Faces Second Antitrust Lawsuit as Consumer Alleges Market Manipulation
May 18, 2026 by
CPI
Coalition of 60+ Groups Urge N.J. Governor to Pause Data Center Construction
May 18, 2026 by
CPI
Commerzbank Rejects UniCredit’s €37 Billion Takeover Offer
May 18, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Unilateral Effects
Apr 28, 2026 by
CPI
A Net Present Value Approach to Merger Analysis
Apr 28, 2026 by
Joseph J Simons & Malcolm Coate
Generative AI and Competitive Disruption: Increasingly Relevant for Merger Analysis?
Apr 28, 2026 by
Andrea Coscelli, Emily Chissell, Nitika Bagaria & Tega Akati-Udi
Non-Price Unilateral Effects In Media Mergers
Apr 28, 2026 by
Lapo Filistrucchi & Teresa Oriani
Ecosystem Mergers and Unilateral Effects? A Framework for Assessing the Ecosystem Theory of Harm
Apr 28, 2026 by
Ethel Fonseca, George Tucker & Helder Vasconcelos