The Justice Department has launched its first criminal prosecution involving the alleged use of cryptocurrency to evade US economic sanctions, reported The Washington Post.
The nine-page complaint headed by US Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui posits that the millions in Bitcoin were used illegally by transmission to sanctioned countries, such as Syria, Russia, North Korea, Iran, and Cuba.
In the ruling, Faruqui disclosed various concerns surrounding digital currencies, weighing in on concepts like the prevailing theory surrounding its anonymity in use, as well as their ultimate standing in regards to legal action. He cites a newly-inducted action filed under the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control, allowing judges to make their own observations and complaints regarding virtual currencies and US sanctions.
“Issue One: virtual currency is untraceable? WRONG … Issue Two: sanctions do not apply to virtual currency? WRONG,” Faruqui wrote, adopting and crediting the staccato-delivery style of the late American political commentator John McLaughlin and his long-running television program, “The McLaughlin Group.”
“The Department of Justice can and will criminally prosecute individuals and entities for failure to comply with OFAC’s regulations, including as to virtual currency,” Faruqui said.
Faraqui sees the case as a simple slam dunk given probable cause in the defendant’s transmission of cryptocurrency and aid to sanctioned countries outside US reach. No matter the ruling, the defendant already is facing a mountain of legal trouble from liability concerns in utilizing two crypto exchanges for said nefarious transactions.
Featured News
Lawmaker Probes FTC and EU’s Role in Amazon’s Failed iRobot Acquisition
May 2, 2024 by
CPI
FTC to Approve Exxon’s $64 Billion Deal with Pioneer Resources, Excludes
May 1, 2024 by
CPI
UK Competition Watchdog Raises Alarm Over Nvidia’s ARM Takeover
May 1, 2024 by
CPI
Sen. Klobuchar Urges Regulators to Probe Collusion in Healthcare Pricing
May 1, 2024 by
CPI
Multiple States Join Tennessee’s Antitrust Lawsuit Against NCAA Over NIL Rules
May 1, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI