Late Sunday night, March 4, the US government asked Qualcomm to delay its annual shareholder meeting by 30 days citing national security concerns, reported The New York Times. The meeting, scheduled for Tuesday, March 6, was supposed to determine whether Singapore-based Broadcom could advance its bid to buy the company.
The surprise move by a government panel that scrutinizes deals by foreign companies comes amid a charged political atmosphere in which scrutiny of takeovers of American companies by international challengers has increased drastically. That the intervention was made even before a deal between the two chip makers was formally reached highlights that shift.
The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), a panel of federal agencies headed by the Treasury Department, has the authority to examine foreign investments in American companies to make sure they don’t threaten national security. The committee usually waits until after a deal is done to check it out. But CFIUS has been more active in recent years. And, if it goes through, Broadcom’s bid for Qualcomm could be the largest technology deal in history.
This announcement is the latest salvo in a pitched battle between the two companies. The months since the bid was unveiled have been characterized by sharply worded statements and by Qualcomm’s frigid response to the terms of the takeover attempt.
Broadcom had sought to pave the way for its hostile bid by changing its headquarters to the United States, an announcement that the chief executive, Hock Tan, made alongside President Trump at the White House last year. That reincorporation is due to be completed by early May, and Broadcom has argued that its status as a soon-to-be American company means the deal should not be subject to review. Nonetheless, regulators, who were asked to look at the deal by Qualcomm, pushed for a delay.
Full Content: New York Times
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Supreme Court Declines to Hear Realtors’ Appeal, DOJ Antitrust Probe Moves Forward
Jan 13, 2025 by
CPI
Commerzbank Chairman Doubts Amicable Merger with UniCredit After Stake Acquisition
Jan 13, 2025 by
CPI
Senator Warren Presses HUD Nominee on Rent Price-Fixing
Jan 13, 2025 by
CPI
Epic Games CEO Accuses Tech Giants of Shifting Loyalties to Court Trump Administration
Jan 13, 2025 by
CPI
Apple’s New Developer Fees Face Renewed Scrutiny from EU Antitrust Regulators
Jan 13, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand