On April 3, 2000, a federal judge made a landmark ruling against Microsoft deciding that the company violated antitrust law in requiring Windows users to use the Internet Explorer browser.
US District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson’s ruling followed his earlier findings, issued in 1999, that Microsoft had sought to abuse its dominance and retain its monopoly by crushing its Apple competition.
The 2000 ruling was a pivotal role for the US Department of Justice, which brought the case against Microsoft in May of 1998. The DOJ claimed that Microsoft’s bundling of Windows and IE escalated what it called the “browser wars,” and that the company had illegally squeezed rival Web browsers from the market.
It wasn’t until November 2001 that Microsoft finally reached a settlement with the DOJ, a move that earned criticism for being insufficient at curbing Microsoft’s anticompetitive practices.
Full Content: Politico
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Turkey Hits Meta with $37.20 Million Fine Over Data-Sharing Practices
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Google Seeks Dismissal of UK Suit Over Alleged Anti-Competitive Practices
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Redfin Settles $9.2M Commission Inflation Lawsuits
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
DOJ Supports Colorado’s Efforts to Block Kroger-Albertsons Merger
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
Japan Considers Regulation of AI Developers
May 7, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI