This article is part of a Chronicle. See more from this Chronicle
Jan Rybnicek, Apr 29, 2014
There exists a new front in the battle to define the precise circumstances under which a monopolist’s refusal to deal with a rival constitutes exclusionary conduct that violates Section 2 of the Sherman Act. The latest clash arises in the context of a brand-name drug manufacturer’s decision not to sell samples of a patented drug that is subject to certain government-mandated restricted distri
...THIS ARTICLE IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR IP ADDRESS 18.97.9.171
Please verify email or join us to access premium content!