Ralph Winter, Apr 01, 2006
In this rejoinder, the author first responds to the discussion in Cooper, Froeb, O’Brien, and Vita’s Reply to Winter of a technical point, the relationship between retailer incentives and retailer margins, and then sets out their common ground and remaining differences on the broader theme of theory and evidence in vertical restraints cases. Cooper et al. stated in their original article that a retailer will provide a lower level of effort than is optimal for the manufacturer when the retailer’s margin is small relative to the manufacturer’s margin. The author claimed in his comment on the article that low retail margins do not necessarily lead to inadequate retailer incentives for promotion.
Featured News
Federal Antitrust Suit Targeting Aircraft Engine Sales Practices Is Settled
Dec 31, 2025 by
CPI
CFTC Withdraws Guidance on ‘Actual Delivery’ in Crypto Transactions, Leaving Regulatory Void
Dec 31, 2025 by
CPI
Coalition of State AGs Push Back Against FCC Proposal Seeking to Preempt State AI Laws
Dec 31, 2025 by
CPI
Apple Seeks to Overturn £1.5 Billion UK App Store Antitrust Ruling
Dec 31, 2025 by
CPI
Age-Restriction Laws Are Proliferating; So Too Are the Difficult Tradeoffs Policymakers Face
Dec 23, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 16, 2025 by
CPI
Learning from Divergence: The Role of Cross-Country Comparisons in the Evaluation of the DMA
Dec 16, 2025 by
Federico Bruni
New Regulatory Tools for the EU Foreign Direct Investment Screening and Foreign Subsidies Regulation
Dec 16, 2025 by
Ioannis Kokkoris
“Suite Dreams”: Market Definition and Complementarity in the Digital Age
Dec 16, 2025 by
Romain Bizet & Matteo Foschi
The Interaction Between Competition Policy and Consumer Protection: Institutional Design, Behavioral Insights, and Emerging Challenges in Digital Markets
Dec 16, 2025 by
Alessandra Tonazzi